|
10-29-2005, 3:53 PM
|
Reply
|
Can you please post photos of your 210,211,226 or even 220 wake photos and let me know how you weight up your boats. Thanks
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
10-29-2005, 4:37 PM
|
Reply
|
Luke, Your profile says that you are in boat sales for Nautique and Sanger? It would seem that you would be the best source for wake photo's... In reality I think photo's of most wakes expecially Nautique's is somewhat pointless. I feel that the shape of the wake is more important than it's size. I nicely shaped wake with a progressive lip like a 210's is not that impressive in photo's. On the other hand pictures of boat's wakes that were not so well shaped look great in photo's. Just my 2 cents, it may not be worth more...
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
10-29-2005, 4:45 PM
|
Reply
|
I agree 100% with Mikeski, pictures never do a wake justice.
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
10-29-2005, 5:00 PM
|
Reply
|
I agree with Mikeski as well, however I would like to see pics of the X-1 wake compared to a 210 wake with the stock ballast.
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
10-29-2005, 6:49 PM
|
Reply
|
They are both NO GOOD stock...they both need about 1000lbs over stock anything more is a plus.
|
Join Date: May 2005
10-30-2005, 11:54 AM
|
Reply
|
I agree with Big Ed, about 1000 over stock makes my 05 X2 wake BIG. Add another 1000 and it get intimidating for some people
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
11-01-2005, 2:48 PM
|
Reply
|
Here is my 2002 210 TE. It has ballast, 200lbs of lead, and 1500 pounds of fat sacs. I also had a couple people in the boat and we were riding in about 85 feet of water. It is a little washy on one side because I like to ride slow. as long as it is clean on the side I am jumping at the time I am fine. It cleans up on whichever side you are on. This is a picture of my friend Griffin. He is about 6 feet tall and rides at 75ft. It is an ok pic, but the guys are correct. the wake looks a lot different in person. A lot steeper and bigger
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
11-01-2005, 2:50 PM
|
Reply
|
Oh yeah, he is riding at about 21.7-22.2 mph on the perfect pass
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
11-01-2005, 3:09 PM
|
Reply
|
Thats a huge wake. You could surf that wake!
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
11-01-2005, 10:24 PM
|
Reply
|
anyone have an x-1 wake for comparison?
|
Join Date: May 2005
11-02-2005, 7:07 PM
|
Reply
|
That's my 05 X2 with only stock ballast (not enough), that was a quick session so we didn't fill the ballast
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
11-02-2005, 7:58 PM
|
Reply
|
Attila ~ here is my boys X2(X1) with about the same weight as that sick Nauti wake above
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
11-02-2005, 8:45 PM
|
Reply
|
thanks, that is sweeet!
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
11-02-2005, 10:35 PM
|
Reply
|
the rider in the above pic is only about 4 feet tall. just thought i'd make you aware of that...
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
11-03-2005, 7:56 AM
|
Reply
|
Scott ~ not in his mind
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
11-03-2005, 2:38 PM
|
Reply
|
C'mon be nice guys......4'2" and a 3\4 inches.
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
11-03-2005, 3:10 PM
|
Reply
|
i bet that guy can fly. being 6'4" was cool when i was playing high school basketball, but i'd love to be shorter and lighter now that i'm officially addicted to wakeboarding
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
11-03-2005, 3:12 PM
|
Reply
|
That and the fact that "He" used to be a "She".
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
11-03-2005, 3:24 PM
|
Reply
|
Jeff,you can't tell me you rather be short.....girls don't like short guys. Cliff......HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 4:00 AM.
|
|