2007 cc 210 0r 2006 mc x-star

(dgreene) · (dgreene) **Join Date: Jun 2008** 09-23-2008, 4:46 AM

looking to buy one or the other would like all inputs mainly if have ridden behind both about wake and comfort.

(himain10ance) · (himain10ance) **Join Date: Apr 2006** 09-23-2008, 7:21 AM

I own a 210 and worked on both and there is no question. I would never own a MC. in all my years of boating the only boat I have had pull back to a dock is a MC. It could be just me but even this forum has alot of posts about mech. problems with MC's

(dgreene) · (dgreene) **Join Date: Jun 2008** 09-23-2008, 7:27 AM

any certain years or models

(02wakesettervlx)

X Star all of the way.

BTW, I have towed my share of Nautiques back to the dock as well.

(polarbill) · (polarbill) **Join Date: Jun 2003** 09-23-2008, 8:20 AM

Scott, that is completely laughable. How about you give us some examples to back up your claim.

By the way, I would go X-Star although wither would be a good choice.

(Message edited by polarbill on September 23, 2008)

(ridesdirt) · (ridesdirt) **Join Date: Jun 2008** 09-23-2008, 8:29 AM

Never ridden behind a 210, but I have the x-star. The wake is a little wide, but it is huge. Some say the x-star has the best wake when weighted properly. I would ride both if you can. I personally like the x-star.

To respond to Scott's comment, I will say in my experience, the only boat I ever towed in was a CC, and I was driving a sea-doo! lol. MC uses Indmar for their engines, I think CC uses PCM. Both make good marine packages so reliability should not be an issue.

(bmartin) · (bmartin) **Join Date: Jan 2007** 09-23-2008, 10:49 AM

If size matters, X-star is your ticket, if efficiency matters go SAN. Both make good wakes but you really have to slam the X-star to get a macking wake.

Don't worry about the tow comments. Both make good boats, the difference will be more about what dealership you take it to to get it serviced which is a local concern, not a brand issue per se.