|
Join Date: Sep 2005
04-13-2007, 8:20 AM
|
Reply
|
Its not the size of the wake, its the talent of the rider.... Not only is this something to tell the girlfriend, but after watching some old wake videos yesterday, I feel like a sally. I find myself whining way to much about wake size and how we NEED that extra fat sac or 8. Back in the beginning of it all, tricks were being learned and invented behind direct drive ski boats with no tower or extended pylon. To top it off the equipment back then wasn't any where near what im riding on today. So there it is, I said it......Im a Sally. Now it better warm up out here in IL so I can go ride, big wake or not.
|
Join Date: May 2003
04-13-2007, 8:26 AM
|
Reply
|
I'm a Sally too. It's okay.
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
04-13-2007, 8:30 AM
|
Reply
|
lol ill complain the wake isnt big enough, then ill ride a friends boat with a bigger wake and be scared lol
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
04-13-2007, 9:09 AM
|
Reply
|
True, it's mostly about technique...but you can make up for bad technique with a huge wake. If wake size didn't matter then everyone that can do a backroll should be able to do an air roll. I'd be willing to bet that 90%+ of people that can do backrolls can not do air rolls...myself included.
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
04-13-2007, 9:53 AM
|
Reply
|
Ill complain more about shape than size, but yea, Ill join the Sally club as well. Ed?
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
04-13-2007, 10:47 AM
|
Reply
|
Not to sound out of the loop or old...but ummmm whats a Sally?
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
04-13-2007, 11:24 AM
|
Reply
|
a nappy headed "__", J/K.
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
04-13-2007, 11:44 AM
|
Reply
|
A sally is like callin somebody a P*ssy. Can I say that Dave?
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tyler
04-13-2007, 11:52 AM
|
Reply
|
or a bitch, i think either is applicable. back then it was a lot more about rider technique than the boat you were behind. i don't bitch about the wake too much, but i know what you mean. with the wakes we're hitting today, we all should be throwin down. so i guess i'm a sally.
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
04-13-2007, 12:03 PM
|
Reply
|
Its nice to know that im not alone in my sallyness.
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
04-13-2007, 12:12 PM
|
Reply
|
I just rode behind a ski nautique without ballast last weekend. Good technique is key, but a big wake really helps everything to be bigger and smoother, especially spins.
|
Join Date: May 2003
04-13-2007, 12:14 PM
|
Reply
|
MATT! Whudup?!
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
04-13-2007, 12:53 PM
|
Reply
|
I thought you where gonna say its "its not the size of the wake but .... the motion in the ocean" lol
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
04-13-2007, 2:28 PM
|
Reply
|
and that's why I continue to leave my favorite quote in my profile....
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
04-13-2007, 2:34 PM
|
Reply
|
I hear this argument a lot, "you don't need a wake that big, pro's can do there stuff of a ripple" Uh, ok. News flash, I am not pro and need all the help I can get. For me bigger wake = more fun. SLAM IT.
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
04-13-2007, 2:37 PM
|
Reply
|
Yah, well back in the day you didnt see Nuke glides, nice long grabbed off spins, double grabbed 5's etc. I am pretty sure Randy just about invented the whole "gigantic amount of weight and long rope". I agree that if you "just want to stick the trick" the wake may not be as huge an issue, but a double grabbed 5 might be near impossible on a small wake, IMHO. Plus they are just more fun, and thats what its all about right? Sally here I guess
|
|