|
Join Date: Feb 2005
04-03-2006, 2:07 PM
|
Reply
|
dont reply if you dont know what youre talkin about or youre just saying it cus you like the graphix. thanx
|
Join Date: May 2004
04-03-2006, 2:18 PM
|
Reply
|
this is a very broad question
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
04-03-2006, 2:36 PM
|
Reply
|
My personal preference would be the Shane, but I'm not sure how much that will help you.
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
04-03-2006, 3:03 PM
|
Reply
|
Probably need to be a bit more specific, Ryan.
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
04-03-2006, 3:32 PM
|
Reply
|
the substance is a great board
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
04-03-2006, 10:00 PM
|
Reply
|
ryan, you need the omega.
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
04-03-2006, 10:24 PM
|
Reply
|
Wait for Aaron Reed's skate to come out!!
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
04-04-2006, 12:01 AM
|
Reply
|
Ryan are you thinking of getting one? If so what do you look for in a board? Or are you just looking for opinions.
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
04-04-2006, 2:58 AM
|
Reply
|
I bought the Watson cause the graphics are sweet and totally matched my bindings.
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
04-04-2006, 6:49 AM
|
Reply
|
I got the shane the graphics are SWEET! oh ya, it rides pretty good.
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
04-04-2006, 8:35 AM
|
Reply
|
k....im going with the watson 142, and transits. but im curious...whats up with the fish? is that a good board? what do you think about the graphix?
|
Join Date: May 2005
04-04-2006, 9:24 AM
|
Reply
|
If you like your board like your women go with the team, it's tight and fast.
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
04-04-2006, 9:26 AM
|
Reply
|
Get the Fish... wait I mean the Watson..... but everyone likes the Shane.... also the Omega looks sick.... I guess I'm not much help
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
04-04-2006, 9:46 AM
|
Reply
|
my substance feels good on the water.
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
04-04-2006, 10:05 AM
|
Reply
|
well, i guess im gonna put every board in a hat and draw one. im sure ill be pleased with my decision. if not, there will be a brand new ride in the boards for sale forum.
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
04-04-2006, 10:19 AM
|
Reply
|
just get the substance if you're not sure what you're looking for in a board. no one dislikes the substance
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
04-04-2006, 2:53 PM
|
Reply
|
Ryan I ask again, what are you looking for in a board? Fast vs slow, tight vs loose, abrupt pop, how much do you weigh?
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
04-04-2006, 4:10 PM
|
Reply
|
based on the criteria you specified, any of these should work: http://wakeworld.com/getcompany.asp?companyid=1&type=1
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
04-04-2006, 4:40 PM
|
Reply
|
I've demo'd the new shane and watson. Both are better than the substance IMO. The shane I liked more than the watson. Lots of pop and overall a great board. Personally I don't really care for the graphics.
|
04-04-2006, 5:02 PM
|
Reply
|
I would go with a Watson...
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
04-04-2006, 6:37 PM
|
Reply
|
Other than the Shane and Watson, I would like to try out an Omega sometime, Greenwood makes that board look so good, or course he could probably make a plank of wood look stylish. I have always wanted to try out a board with the C3 rocker line.
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
04-04-2006, 7:38 PM
|
Reply
|
Yeah, Greenwood freaking rips on any board...I'm surprised more of you haven't mentioned the PS3
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
04-04-2006, 9:27 PM
|
Reply
|
if you don't know enough to know what board suits you best, get the omega for sure. a lot of riders out there would improve if they switched to the omega.
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
04-04-2006, 9:31 PM
|
Reply
|
How do the C3 boards ride, is it really the best of both worlds, or is it just marketing?
|
|