|
Join Date: Jun 2006
04-29-2008, 10:05 PM
|
Reply
|
Rider is 6'2"
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
04-29-2008, 10:13 PM
|
Reply
|
65' line, 21 mph, mc 205, helmet while riding wake to wake- blah
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
04-29-2008, 10:19 PM
|
Reply
|
Thanks for being a good sport Jason! Right on the profile picture wrong on this one.
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
04-29-2008, 10:26 PM
|
Reply
|
looks like a 70's tri-hull w/ outboard wake.
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
04-29-2008, 10:29 PM
|
Reply
|
Or an OLD Malibu VLX
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
04-29-2008, 10:47 PM
|
Reply
|
sanger ?
|
Join Date: May 2007
04-29-2008, 10:53 PM
|
Reply
|
i second sanger
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
04-29-2008, 11:12 PM
|
Reply
|
naw look how deep the trough is and the steepness of the wake. its a Super air 210 team (2006 and older)?? (Message edited by kickflip_mj on April 29, 2008)
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
04-29-2008, 11:27 PM
|
Reply
|
I'd Say Bu VLX or Natty 210. Leaning towards a Bu cause a Malibu has that concave between the wake and the regular water surface. I'd say its going a little slow however because the white wash is close to the front [why I said Natty]. Edit: sorry, I meant Natty 220. (Message edited by hawk7 on April 29, 2008)
|
Join Date: May 2004
04-30-2008, 4:17 AM
|
Reply
|
I don't think its a 210.. its not vert enough IMO. It's a heavily weighted 20-22 foot Sportsboat I reckon.... Also I think the line is deceptively short; possibly 60-65 feet.
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minnesnowda
04-30-2008, 6:48 AM
|
Reply
|
210 fo sho.
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
04-30-2008, 7:49 AM
|
Reply
|
MB
|
Join Date: May 2003
04-30-2008, 7:54 AM
|
Reply
|
whatever it is, it needs more weight.
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
04-30-2008, 8:11 AM
|
Reply
|
that picture is deceiving, the wake isn't as steep as it appears at first, it is not a 210 By the look of the profile picture, the wake is very wide and like i thought, not steep at all, VLX with only the wedge and ballast
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
04-30-2008, 8:16 AM
|
Reply
|
Looks like a MC Maristar 230 V-drive
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
04-30-2008, 8:21 AM
|
Reply
|
if thats a 210 i'm ashamed
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
04-30-2008, 8:21 AM
|
Reply
|
Hard to tell without actually seeing a good picture of the wake.
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
04-30-2008, 8:36 AM
|
Reply
|
Supra?
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
04-30-2008, 8:55 AM
|
Reply
|
I'm gonna guess Moomba LSV or XLV? It would help if the boat wasn't turning. (Message edited by phenom_1819 on April 30, 2008)
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
04-30-2008, 9:08 AM
|
Reply
|
beautiful water + beautiful untouched hills. i need to go there.
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
04-30-2008, 3:33 PM
|
Reply
|
Wake looks big, but man is that line short and I'm guessing 18-20 MPH because of the wash behind the rider. Kinda looks like what used to happen with my I/O Seaswirl.
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
04-30-2008, 4:28 PM
|
Reply
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
04-30-2008, 6:16 PM
|
Reply
|
That second one has some pretty big air. Very nice indeed.
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
04-30-2008, 6:41 PM
|
Reply
|
How much is stock ballast on one of those? To make our wake look like that we have to fill the whole floor. I did it by accident once, didn't work out too well. Our boat is like 3 feet shorter though.
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
04-30-2008, 8:40 PM
|
Reply
|
OH! I know the answer! It's a 2006 Sante...70 ft 23 MPH Full stock ballast with 250 in the bow. Am I right? Where's my prize?
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
04-30-2008, 8:58 PM
|
Reply
|
yea Jason...thanks for ragging on the helmet.
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
04-30-2008, 9:44 PM
|
Reply
|
OH wait what did i say earlier???? A 2006 SANTE?? lol Andy- we hit it right on. booyahh
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
04-30-2008, 10:27 PM
|
Reply
|
|
|