Let Everyone shoot an AK~47...
If you want to shoot an AK~47,then you go to a Special compound where all thay shoot is semi Automatic weapons,so everyone there has a AK~47 and you shoot targets,,,But then you watch these AK~47 shooters will be wondering if the person shooting NEXT to them is crazzzzy,,,You watch how fast these guys want gun control...
|
Lol what? I have shot around a bunch of guys like that, wasn't skeered.
|
But Did you wonder,what If???
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I have shot an AK with a bunch of dudes and did think, How is this legal oh and it is a lot of fun.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Smoothie ,I have had a Driver jump the center divider and hit me @ 70 MPH,That is why I've been hurt for 32 years ...I can see how Shooting an AK~47 can be FUNNNN,But besides that,WHAT is it good for ,do you hunt with an AK~47???its made for per destruction,So why should the general population be able to buy this Toy???Nobody should be able to buy this toy ,its a military Tool...
|
I have hunted deer with it, and believe it or not is a smaller round than a popular 308 or 270 hunting rifle.
An AR 15 can't be used to hunt deer here because it isn't powerful enough. |
Quote:
What's with all the AK hate? don't even need a special stock to bump fire one Have you ever been in a McDonalds and wondered how many people around are you going to die from diabetes? |
Quote:
As for the argument that there are lots of other guns that are as powerful as an AK.. Fine we shouldn't be allowed to have those either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is made for destruction. It's a military grade weapon and we have them because of the 2cd amendment. The 2cd amendment exists so that the people can fight the government if needed. How are the people going to fight if they don't have serious weapons? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
LMFAO. Yeap lets ban bars!!!!!!!
The AR also comes in a 308 called the AR 10. I have one and use it for deer hunting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You and your personal stockpile of weapons isn't going to do Jack against the Government. They have drones, they have ballistic sniper, they can kill you from space. Your personal arsenal is as usefull as my daughters teddy bear. It makes you feel good so you can sleep better. You certainly are NOT the last line of defense against a tyrannical government, because the government will kick your militarily puny A$$. |
Quote:
Fighting the gub'ment is what made the 2nd so important, but I don't think it applies any less to anyone else. As Americans, we reserve the right to defend ourselves. Against anyone. |
Quote:
|
Dont ban bars...just eliminate parking spaces.;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe when the government and citizens had the same arsenal, your argument may be valid but when the US Navy could launch a tomahawk up your ass from a 1000 miles away, I'd say "fighting the gub'ment" is no longer a viable argument. But if that's what you need to keep you comfortable at night, keep on keepin' on. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Turns out its not about arming every idiot for fun, it was about having an armed coast guard. |
Quote:
|
Why are we spending over a 1/2 trillion a year on a military budget when all we need to do is give everyone a gun? Just like Afghanistan.
|
So if that does happen and half the military sides against the government, the other side has good weapons too.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Lol.
I don't have guns to feel safe. I have guns for sport. |
If we wanted Afghanistan, you can trust their piddly guns would be no match.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
American gun owners represent the largest army in the world. Man to man, weapon to weapon, american gun owners are very powerful. Another part of the argument is....what would our brothers and sisters in the military actually do if it came down to the people going to war with the government? People serving in law enforcement and the military are typically conservatives that value and believe in the purpose of the 2cd amendment. So would they side with their families and become "the people" and fight the government, or would they fight for the politicians? To your comment about my guns being as useful as your daughters teddy bears.....I'm not sure what to say about that, except that you seem like the type to exaggerate a lot and make pretty outlandish examples. It's difficult to take you seriously. I have my beliefs and you have yours. The purpose of the 2cd amendment is what it is, whether you believe in it or not, it's there for the reason I stated and that's a fact. I believe in the purpose, and I'm the type to fight back for the principal. Maybe you aren't that type and that's okay. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If my kid hits another kid with a stick I don't blame the stick but I do take the stick away. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Dear FBI
Please add everyone who posted in this thread to the people who can’t or should NOT own a gun because clearly they are mentally unstable. If you were not smart enough to avoid the libral idiots trolling then you are clearly not smart enough to own any fire arm. Infact please include sharp instruments to list of things you should all not be able to pick up and use. This include kitchen silverware. Sporks from now on boys. |
Quote:
Just don't try to take the sticks away from the kids in the red neighborhood. They believe in protecting themselves. |
Quote:
|
^^ Good point. You can keep your Ar’s LOL LOL
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
While your narrative sounds really cool, it's not close to accurate. |
Quote:
Despite what you think, a gun does not make a person "powerful". Let's be honest here, the majority of this US gun owner army you describe would not be able to pull the trigger in the heat of the moment. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...3d6591e047.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So do you disagree with the claim that not allowing alcohol being sold at establishments with parking would lower drunk driving incidents? I'm asking because you didn't directly address my claim. Instead you act like you are refuting it by presenting strawman arguments. I didn't say that there would be no drunk driving. It's a strawman argument to pretend like I did when I know that the one point I made would not completely eliminate drunk driving. And I never suggested it would.
"There would still be drunk drivers because people that don't obey the laws won't start obeying them if you make another one. " So are you claiming that people who drive drunk want to break the law so bad that they will open their own establishments with parking lots and serve alcohol if it were illegal? I'm pretty sure most people don't drive drunk because they want to break the law as you suggested. I believe they drive drunk because they enjoy partying at bars and still have to get home. |
Quote:
|
^good post and NOT a straw man argument. I agree 100%
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"I believe they drive drunk because they enjoy partying at bars and still have to get home." |
Quote:
|
Keep it. I can get one from Amazon Prime much sooner.
|
This whole thread is about people who are familiar with guns and comfortable handling them trying to reason with people who are scared of guns and not comfortable with private citizens who own them. Let's break this down real simple for everyone. If a Policeman with a gun saves your life,he's a good policeman. If a Policeman with a gun takes someone's life without a lawful reason he's a bad policeman. You don't take away all policeman's guns because you would be defenseless against criminals. If you don't think policeman are human then I can't reason with you. I personally think policeman are human first and policeman second. There are good and bad in every profession out there. We already have laws in place to control the sale of guns all we as a nation need to do is enforce them. More laws won't make bad people obey them . Good people shouldn't be penalized for obeying the laws. For all the people who say you don't need a gun. What's the first thing you would do if someone broke into your house after midnight? Call someone with a gun and hope they got there in time to save you.How many people have a fire extinguisher in their house but have never had a fire? This is no different than owning a gun and not using it till it's needed. Although I would recommend going to a shooting range and practicing with your gun so if you did need it you would be effective with it.You may ask why I use a fire extinguisher as an example? Both Guns and Fire Extinguishers are legal to own and both can be used for good and bad things. Also both can be owned and never needed. You may ask what can be bad about a fire extinguisher? A fire Extinguisher can be used to hit someone over the head or shoot into someone's eyes. Most good people would not do those things with a fire extinguisher to an innocent non threatening human being.
|
Wonder how long it's going to be until we have a mass fire extinguisher clubbing now that it's been revealed that their danger can be compared to guns.
|
Fire Extinguishers are used everyday to commit crimes. It's commonly known among thieves that fire extinguishers shot all over where the thief has been makes it nearly impossible to get fingerprints after their crimes. I learned that from the police after a break in.
|
Quote:
The police can NOT take a gun away from someone who is on the DO NOT FLY list. What do you have against a law like that? Why do gun people feel the need to stop reasonable gun laws. I had to pass a test to drive a car. I can't just sell it to anyone without filling out paper work. What is the problem with having the same laws for guns? The laws in place that "control the sale of guns" have no teeth. We need to write new laws that do have teeth. Do you expect anything to change without writing new laws? Or do you think the idea that you might have to fill out some paperwork or wait a few days to get a gun to much of an inconvenience and its worth the risk of more guns in the hands of nut jobs? The only reason to be against these kind of common sense laws is if you are a criminal, nut job, or own stock in the gun manufacturers. Quote:
Why are gun people so afraid of the world around them? Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=fly135;1976132]Deemed unconstitutional by the 2008 SC that you can't take away guns without due process.
QUOTE] Which is why we need to change that. Its called an AMENDMENT for a reason, the founding fathers wanted us to be able to change it. Tomas Jefferson wrote a letter to James Madison where he asked to put into the constitution that all laws and constitutional AMENDMENTS expire after 18 years and the new government of 18 years in the future can decide if it is still a good idea. The 2nd Amendment has no place in the modern world so lets get rid of it. It doesn't make you safer, it doesn't protect you from the government coming to get you, it just kills people unnecessarily and makes small people feel bigger. |
Quote:
My argument is there are too many guns in this country. It's really simple: MORE GUNS IN A POPULATION = HIGHER INSTANCES OF GUN VIOLENCE IN A POPULATION Now, yours and others solution is more guns means more safety. Guess what, it really means higher instances of gun violence. So you can choose to do two things. Ignore it, but don't get upset or outraged when some deranged individual shoots up a school and kills innocent children. Or we can come up with something sensible and ignore the profits of gun manufacturers. That is the sole purpose of the NRA, maximizing profits. |
If you could just get a SC majority that doesn't ignore the parts of the 2nd they don't like you wouldn't need another amendment. Maybe we could get a SC that ignores the part about not being infringed and only cares about the well regulated part. Wouldn't that be sweet! LOL.
|
Quote:
This is an honest question, do you feel that your right to bear arms outweighs the danger it poses to the kids at school? Oh and on a personal note, talking about kids being killed is not something you should Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why are you against expanding that law so that it works? FYI: The Vegas shooter had no history of violent incidents, or mental health issues and would have passed the database check. |
Quote:
I'm simply saying, taking guns away will NOT make kids any safer, and in fact, will make mine LESS safe. I WON'T be able to protect them either at home or out on the town without a firearm. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 1:14 PM. |