Articles
   
       
       
Pics/Video
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WAKE WORLD HOME
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > Boats, Accessories & Tow Vehicles

Share 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-13-2012, 9:25 AM Reply   
Just came in!! Headed to the lake!
Attached Images
  
Old    Dave (bcrider)      Join Date: Apr 2006       09-13-2012, 9:48 AM Reply   
That's one sweet looking boat.
Old    Chris Bucklin (chrisbucklin)      Join Date: Mar 2012       09-13-2012, 9:55 AM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcrider View Post
That's one sweet looking boat.
I love the color!! Wish the worlds had a blue option....o well black looks good too.
Old    TJ (Houstonshark)      Join Date: Jan 2011       09-13-2012, 10:09 AM Reply   
That's sweet. Can you post some interior pics? If you're going out, wakeboard and wakesurf wake pics would be awesome too!
Old    Parker Caskey (wakesetter_WW)      Join Date: Jul 2010       09-13-2012, 10:20 AM Reply   
Can someone explain to me what the difference is between the Worlds and the SA 350-550s? Thanks
Old    Parker Caskey (wakesetter_WW)      Join Date: Jul 2010       09-13-2012, 10:22 AM Reply   
Haven't been able to see one in person but how is it only rated for a capacity of 10 people while the MXZ is rated for 15? I've been looking at the specs and can't figure out where some of the space went. The MXZ beam is 102 and the SA is 100. However the length on the MXZ is 23'3 and the SA is 23'6.
Old    Brett Yates (polarbill)      Join Date: Jun 2003       09-13-2012, 10:37 AM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakesetter_WW View Post
Haven't been able to see one in person but how is it only rated for a capacity of 10 people while the MXZ is rated for 15? I've been looking at the specs and can't figure out where some of the space went. The MXZ beam is 102 and the SA is 100. However the length on the MXZ is 23'3 and the SA is 23'6.
I am going to take a guess and say it has nothing to do with room in the boat. It probably all has to do with getting some sort of certification where they are counting all the ballast, including the plug and play into the max capacity. I wouldnt' be surprised if we see more companies doing this to help protect themselves from lawsuits like what happened in the X45 case.
Old    Andrew Carnacchi (07launch22ssv)      Join Date: Feb 2007       09-13-2012, 12:27 PM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakesetter_WW View Post
Can someone explain to me what the difference is between the Worlds and the SA 350-550s? Thanks
Engine.
Old    Darren Yearsley (ralph)      Join Date: Apr 2002       09-13-2012, 12:29 PM Reply   
I'm not much of a fan of pickle forks but that boat is freakin beautiful
Old    Brandon Zubke (bzubke1)      Join Date: Feb 2010       09-13-2012, 1:38 PM Reply   
I'm curious if the 350 has enough power once you have around 4k in weight in the boat. If you happen to do that let us know what you think.
Old    Darren Yearsley (ralph)      Join Date: Apr 2002       09-13-2012, 1:47 PM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakesetter_WW View Post
Can someone explain to me what the difference is between the Worlds and the SA 350-550s? Thanks
Just engine size and options, or are you asking specifics?
Old    Diggs (pdxWAKE) (tyler97217)      Join Date: Aug 2004       09-13-2012, 5:39 PM Reply   
Just plain sick! Can't wait to see one out here. I have a feeling it could be my next boat......
Old    Chris Bucklin (chrisbucklin)      Join Date: Mar 2012       09-13-2012, 6:04 PM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakesetter_WW View Post
Haven't been able to see one in person but how is it only rated for a capacity of 10 people while the MXZ is rated for 15? I've been looking at the specs and can't figure out where some of the space went. The MXZ beam is 102 and the SA is 100. However the length on the MXZ is 23'3 and the SA is 23'6.

what my dealer said was this(this almost stopped me from buying this!!) was master craft had a law suit agianst them and soon all boats will have to figure in the ballast in with there ppl. so thats y if u noticed the 242 went down in 2013 to 16ppl or 15(dont remember) from 17! i think in the future u will c more ppl doing this. it does suck for sure!
Old    Chris Bucklin (chrisbucklin)      Join Date: Mar 2012       09-13-2012, 6:07 PM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakesetter_WW View Post
Can someone explain to me what the difference is between the Worlds and the SA 350-550s? Thanks
the worlds is a package..like the silver flake,lights,speakers,and 18s on trailer(also many other small things on trailer)..i thinkn the worlds package was like 4500 more. but if u added all the extras on there it would come out to way more. even like the under water lighting and all. its basicly the fully loaded version...thats how i understand it.
Old    Chris Bucklin (chrisbucklin)      Join Date: Mar 2012       09-13-2012, 6:09 PM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler97217 View Post
Just plain sick! Can't wait to see one out here. I have a feeling it could be my next boat......
if anyone is from wisconsin. u will b seeing one on the water by the end of october! my build date is oct.16th..7-10 to build they said! then deliver!
Old    Miguel (migs)      Join Date: Aug 2006       09-13-2012, 7:07 PM Reply   
So Gangster!
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-14-2012, 12:33 PM Reply   
Sorry it took so long!!!
I'm a dealer just wanted to make sure that is out there.

Likes SA 350

1) Skier's Choice best product to date
2) Wake is clean at 16.7mph (great for small kids)
3) Fit and Finish ( The best SC has out so Far)
4) Plenty of Storage
5) Driver seat is super comfortable
6) Speed control at the steering wheel ( easy to make speed adjustments without taking your eyes off the rider and surroundings)
7) The new Vision touch screen is easy to work. It even worked with my hands wet.
8) No cavitations when loaded or in the turns
9) No rolling or banking in the turns
10) The wake was easy to set up, not sensitive like the past Supra's (we were off set by 200lbs and the wake was clean)
11) The wake was really rampy, a nice lip at the top with a ton of boot
12) The engine sounds mean!!!

How we had it set up:

900 in floor ballast
1600 in the flex ballast ( 600 rear 600 rear 400 bow)
450 sac front 450 sac floor
760 lbs in people
364 lbs in gas
total weight 4524

The 350 Engine

Does great with stock and flex ballast. When we added the additional sacs it planed out fine. Any more added weight it had a hard time. For most people that is plenty of engine. If you are wanting to be a pro or need more the 4000 lbs then I would bump up to the 450.

The Dislikes:

1) Hard to see the vision due to the steering wheel
2) Tower has a spot on it that could be finished better (Rosewell)
3) Had to drive it a little more careful once we put 4000 lbs in it (unlike the Moomba Mojo)
4) Hard to come up with more!!
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-14-2012, 12:37 PM Reply   
Name:  P9121289.jpg
Views: 572
Size:  106.9 KBWake at 16.7 mph
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-14-2012, 12:42 PM Reply   
Name:  P9121303.jpg
Views: 570
Size:  95.1 KBWake at 20.5 mph just floor ballast
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-14-2012, 12:47 PM Reply   
Name:  P9121306.jpg
Views: 552
Size:  100.8 KB Floor and Flex ballast at 22.7
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-14-2012, 12:50 PM Reply   
Name:  P9121310.jpg
Views: 543
Size:  83.1 KB Floor, Flex, and extra bags 23.7mph 80 feet
Old    Chris Bucklin (chrisbucklin)      Join Date: Mar 2012       09-14-2012, 12:58 PM Reply   
I like what I c and here. Thanks for all the info. Did u buy the supra? Or test drive?
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-14-2012, 1:06 PM Reply   
Name:  P9121319.jpg
Views: 535
Size:  80.6 KB 9.4mph 450 on floor, rear ballast, rear flex, and half in the front ballast
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-14-2012, 1:08 PM Reply   
I work at the dealership. I will order mine very soon!!!
Old    Nick (drive139)      Join Date: Apr 2007       09-14-2012, 2:06 PM Reply   
Danny, what is the MSRP on the 350?
Old    Brett Yates (polarbill)      Join Date: Jun 2003       09-14-2012, 2:26 PM Reply   
My early guess is 100k msrp for that boat with a realistic selling price of 85k. Am I close?
Old    Spencer (spencerwm)      Join Date: Feb 2009       09-14-2012, 3:09 PM Reply   
That wake looks awesome.
Old    A.J. West (you_da_man)      Join Date: Sep 2009       09-14-2012, 3:14 PM Reply   
Boat and wake looks awesome. Just asking....but did you guys just get the boat and then just slammed all the weight into it without breaking in the engine?
Old    Chris Bucklin (chrisbucklin)      Join Date: Mar 2012       09-14-2012, 7:03 PM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by you_da_man View Post
Boat and wake looks awesome. Just asking....but did you guys just get the boat and then just slammed all the weight into it without breaking in the engine?
what do they call for break in? i heard like 3-5 hours??? that would b easy!! man i cant wait!
Old    B Poser (bbr)      Join Date: Apr 2002       09-14-2012, 8:43 PM Reply   
The boat looks great, but the wake doesn't look that nice to me. I mean with 3000lbs of ballast that thing should be way bigger IMO. Our wake is bigger in a 5' deep lake. With all the hoopla surrounding the "Shock and Awe" I would have expected bigger things from the wake.
Old    A.J. West (you_da_man)      Join Date: Sep 2009       09-14-2012, 9:47 PM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisbucklin View Post
what do they call for break in? i heard like 3-5 hours??? that would b easy!! man i cant wait!
Never seen a break-in recommendation under 10 hours. Supra/Moomba recommends 10 hours. I guess a dealer demo boat so it'll be sold off to someone else
Old     (nitrousbird)      Join Date: Sep 2008       09-15-2012, 7:31 AM Reply   
From what I've seem to be reading, this boat sounds MORE expensive than the MXZ...but I can't see a single reason for purchasing this over the MXZ.
Old    Danny (fatwing)      Join Date: Oct 2007       09-15-2012, 9:14 AM Reply   
We did do the break in period on the boat. The boat was here a couple of days before we took it out and tested it. Indmars break in period is 10hrs.
The MSRP on this boat is 102
Old    Brandon Zubke (bzubke1)      Join Date: Feb 2010       09-15-2012, 9:16 AM Reply   
How much will the boat actually go for 80k?
Old    RB (boardman74)      Join Date: Jul 2012       09-15-2012, 9:28 AM Reply   
Boat looks sweet!! Wake looks big!! Great looking boat.

Reply
Share 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 3:38 AM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2012 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us