Wake 101
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WakeWorld Home
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > Video and Photography

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old     (scott_a)      Join Date: Dec 2002       03-03-2010, 12:20 AM Reply   
Judge Joe Brown doesn't like that a professional wedding photog showed up with a Rebel xti and 18-55mm lens. Defendant makes crazy claims about her camera. Judge happens to know a thing or two about photography. Hilarity ensues.

Old     (goinbigg17)      Join Date: Jul 2002       03-03-2010, 5:44 AM Reply   
Go Judge Joe Brown! That was great, thanks for sharing!
Old     (dakid)      Join Date: Feb 2001       03-03-2010, 6:30 AM Reply   
oh man, that was freakin' awesome!!!
Old     (calexan)      Join Date: Dec 2008       03-03-2010, 6:34 AM Reply   
Hahahaha Judge Joe Brown just schooled the courtroom on cameras!
Old     (wakedad33)      Join Date: Oct 2005       03-03-2010, 7:11 AM Reply   
That was great
Old     (ktm525)      Join Date: Mar 2009       03-03-2010, 7:42 AM Reply   
Nice the judge schools the audience!!!
Old     (Walt)      Join Date: Jan 2003       03-03-2010, 3:23 PM Reply   
A lot of times you get what you pay for and I wouldn't expect to much for 1300.00. A quality wedding photographer is going to cost you a lot more than that. Judge/Photographer Brown should of known that and taken that into consideration IMHO. It looked like Judge Brown was more interested in spouting techno babble to impress the audience than he was in being a impartial judge.
Old     (dakid)      Join Date: Feb 2001       03-03-2010, 8:54 PM Reply   
though i agree that judge brown was trying to impress the viewers, his verdict was spot on, imo. the photographers were deceitful, thus the judgement being 2.5x what the plaintiff was suing for.
Old     (calexan)      Join Date: Dec 2008       03-04-2010, 9:12 AM Reply   
Arent most of the court show cases previously decided in an actual court? Then the TV judges can play up however they want to reach the same decision the actual court came to. I heard the producers go through hundreds of Cali court cases to find the interesting ones then contact the Plaintiffs and Defendants and pay them to recreate the case on television. This would atleast explain how Judge Joe Brown could escape an appeal that the judge was not fair and impartial.
Old     (Sly_Park_Mark)      Join Date: Mar 2010       03-04-2010, 12:21 PM Reply   
It seemed like the judge was out to get the defendant from the beginning. Not that I disagree with him; using a kit lens for pro wedding photography is definitely decietful. Plus you would think a pro photographer would at least understand f-stops and ISO, which this lady clearly did not.
Old     (sidekicknicholas)      Join Date: Mar 2007       03-04-2010, 6:19 PM Reply   
+1 for Joe.

if thats the case I'm a pro-photographer with my D40
Old     (garveyj)      Join Date: Sep 2009       03-05-2010, 6:00 AM Reply   
It was very funny to watch - I love how he hounds her on the F-stop she was using. Plus the fact that she was not using flash to take the inside pictures....If the preist was really that sensitive she should have brought him as a witness to court - otherwise her arguments are nothing.
Old     (canucked)      Join Date: Jun 2007       03-05-2010, 9:50 AM Reply   
I love the iphone comment.

I'm pretty sure i've been told no flash inside of old churches, museums etc.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 1:22 AM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home


© 2016 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us