Articles
   
       
       
Pics/Video
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WAKE WORLD HOME
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > Video and Photography

Share 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old    D C (dirwoody)      Join Date: Apr 2003       10-18-2008, 8:24 AM Reply   
I'm currently looking at a couple different lens options and right now I'm between a Canon 70-200L F4 IS USM and the Canon 100-400L F5.6 IS USM. I'm really not sure if I need it to reach out as far at the 400, but it would be nice at times. Anybody have any thoughts?
Old    Ryan Taylor (wakesurf12)      Join Date: Jun 2003       10-18-2008, 10:24 AM Reply   
70-200. Great focal lengths. Having that extra reach of a 400 would be nice but you might find yourself limited if it is your first long lens. Plus at 5.6 it is a really slow lens. Probably would find yourself in more situations where you needed that extra light.
Old    D C (dirwoody)      Join Date: Apr 2003       10-18-2008, 12:49 PM Reply   
That's understandable. As for the 70-200, I know the 2.8 is insane, but the 4 is much more in my price range, in your opinion, which would be better for shooting mainly outdoors?

I figure with either of these, I could also add an extender to get that extra bit of range, but that really slows things down too, so many options....
Old    Randy Scagliotti (wakedad33)      Join Date: Oct 2005       10-18-2008, 6:08 PM Reply   
I have somewhat of the same delima, I have decided on the 70-200 F4 but can't decide on the IS for the extra $400. Pro's / Con's???
Old    Rich Dykmans (richd)      Join Date: Oct 2003       10-19-2008, 4:48 AM Reply   
Pro's of the f4 L IS:

IQ (especially at f4) - best of all the Canon 70-200 L's.

IS, which can really help get keepers in some situations and with teleconvertors onboard.

IQ with a 1.4X TC onboard is unbelievably good and doesn't slow the AF down at all.

I had a pretty good 100-400 but it didn't have that IQ "POP" that you'll get with the 70-200. The pump zoom is OK once you get used to it but will never be as fast as a twist zoom IMO. Since the 70-200 with a 1.4X on is still better IQ wise then a 100-400 and smaller, I'm pretty happy now just owning the 70-200 and my 400 primes to cover those ranges.

(Message edited by richd on October 19, 2008)
Old    Clubmyke (clubmyke)      Join Date: Aug 2004       10-22-2008, 1:17 AM Reply   
i have owned both the 70-200 f4 and the 70-200 f4 IS.

the IS version is worth the extra money in terms of image quality. it is also a very light weight lens.

if you dont shoot a lot with a big zoom then then the non IS version is still a awesome lens and a bargain at $600 new ( i shoot 80% of the time with my 24-70 f2.8 )

Reply
Share 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 5:15 PM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2012 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us