Articles
   
       
       
Pics/Video
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WAKE WORLD HOME
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > >> Boats, Accessories & Tow Vehicles Archive > Archive through May 08, 2008

Share 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old    Schuey (schuey)      Join Date: Apr 2005       04-27-2008, 7:35 AM Reply   
Hey guys, Ive had a search through the forums for advice on weighting a 2001 nautique, but i could only find a couple of threads.
From what I did see, I was thinking that 2 600lbs Sacs, one either side of the engine, and 300 lbs in lead bars under the bow seemed about a good amount to go with... What do you think of that? Is it a good plan for placement, will I need more weight to create a good wake or does that sound ok?

If anyone has any pictures, or advice I would appreciate it. Cheers!
Old    Erik Jernberg (juniorhawk)      Join Date: Jul 2004       04-27-2008, 8:00 AM Reply   
Here is one way. Eventually I built an enclosure for the rear tank but this is a good way to do it. 2001's like weight in the middle, just like all sport nautiques and 95-06 super sport/210's

Upload
Old    Kevin Hoye (wakebrdr38)      Join Date: Sep 2006       04-27-2008, 4:57 PM Reply   
300 front, 880 middle, 725 in the rear. its a great set up, make sure you reprop with an acme 542
Old    MidWestTex (midwesttex)      Join Date: Jul 2004       04-28-2008, 11:20 AM Reply   
You might have trouble fitting 600lb sacks on either side of the engine.
Old    Jon (jon4pres)      Join Date: May 2004       04-28-2008, 12:32 PM Reply   
Weight in the back makes the wake steep
Weight in the front makes it more mellow

Just decide which way you like it and put as much weight in it as you can.

I run 440s on both sides of the motor and 100 lb of lead in th tip of the nose. It makes a nice wake without repropping.
Old    J Wilson (illkid)      Join Date: Sep 2006       04-28-2008, 2:54 PM Reply   
Your simplest and most effective system I think would be a Fly High Pro X Series 750 on each side of the engine. But if you like the interior room, do a 750 where the rear seat is now and a Fly High 580 width wise under the bow.
Old    Fro-Z (froese)      Join Date: Jun 2005       04-28-2008, 8:35 PM Reply   
750's are a bit big for the sides... Put's a lot of pressure on the motor box when filled up (if you can even fill them all the way.

I run 300lbs. in the nose, 500x2 on either side of the engine and 500-750 in the back (I fill the back if I have passengers in the front... too much in the back and you get a curb to crash into... way way vertical wake).

Here's a recent pic w/around 2100lbs. total ballast. 22mph @ 70':

Upload
Upload
Old    Mitch (wakemitch)      Join Date: Jun 2005       04-28-2008, 8:43 PM Reply   
Fro-Z, that is my perfect wake. mmmmmmm.
Old    882001 (882001)      Join Date: Nov 2003       04-29-2008, 5:40 AM Reply   
funny how that wake blows some of the new 80k boats away. not a v-drive it must suck?
Old    Nacho (denverd1)      Join Date: May 2004       04-29-2008, 5:54 AM Reply   
lol yea it must suck! i love that argument. nothing else screams NEWB more than that.
Old    J Wilson (illkid)      Join Date: Sep 2006       04-29-2008, 8:16 AM Reply   
Yeah come to think of it, those 750 are a bit wide to run next to the motor. I've seen a guy run those Launch Pad 540 recliners and they seem to fit perfect next to the motor. And last time I looked on Wakeside, they were on sale for $50 a piece.
Old    Fro-Z (froese)      Join Date: Jun 2005       04-29-2008, 8:41 AM Reply   
ProX V-Drive Sacs on the Sides. ProX 750 in the rear.

Fits well, and perfect weight as long as you have about 200-300 lbs. in the front.
Old    Kevin Hoye (wakebrdr38)      Join Date: Sep 2006       04-29-2008, 7:48 PM Reply   
im running the same exaxt set up as Fro-Z, i dont even take out the back seat. it fits for me between the back seat and the engine cover just fine. this puts the weight a lil farther forward to help with the curb effect. we can also tell a huge difference in having the side sacs up against the rear sear vs. back against the rear sac. its only like a foot difference but i really prefer as much weight forward as possible when dealing with a totally full 750 pounder in the back. as for the front, i have 150 pounds in free weights and i plumbed in 150 launch pad sac up there thats sitting on its own little table that goes width wise across the front.
Old    Josh B (joshugan)      Join Date: Apr 2005       04-29-2008, 8:42 PM Reply   
I've heard that the 540 prop is better for 351 2001s and the 5542 for the 302s? Can anyone confirm this?

With the stock prop I'm running 400 on the sides and have about 50lbs of weight in the bow. (similar to Jon). If we only have three people we'll scoot the side sacs back a little further and throw a sack in front of the engine box. It's awkward but works.

When I first started using my 2001 I just threw an ice chest full of water in the back. Those were the days!

Also, you may want to get "boxes" to go over your side sacks. My buddy welded me two that are more open metal frames with carpeted wood on top. It's so nice though for moving around.
Old    Darren Yearsley (ralph)      Join Date: Apr 2002       04-30-2008, 2:05 AM Reply   
1500 pounds tanks in the back, currently got 200 pounds of lead and a big battery in the front but it needs another 200 pounds in the front to make it really nice. Might work on a tank over winter.
Upload
Upload
Upload
Old    Kevin Hoye (wakebrdr38)      Join Date: Sep 2006       04-30-2008, 12:02 PM Reply   
542 is better for a lot of weight and the 540 is better for crossover from what i was told. that was for the 351 with 1 to 1 transmission
Old    Matt (ncsuuh)      Join Date: Jan 2007       04-30-2008, 5:31 PM Reply   
Darren- is that one tank or three different tanks? Also, is it made of wood or aluminum?
Old    Darren Yearsley (ralph)      Join Date: Apr 2002       04-30-2008, 9:26 PM Reply   
Two L-shaped tanks which form a U around the motor. The carpet is held on the tanks with snaps. The piece of ply is a pattern for a drop in seat base. I made the tanks out of ply & glassed them internally.
Old    Jos (jtnz)      Join Date: Sep 2007       05-01-2008, 4:45 PM Reply   
I thought you were selling her... Too much work to flick? It is a really nicely done boat.

Never noticed those pieces that hook together on the ends of the tanks, that's cool. Kiwi ingenuity to the max.
Old    Darren Yearsley (ralph)      Join Date: Apr 2002       05-01-2008, 5:12 PM Reply   
No still for sale, I doubt it will move over winter tho.
Old    Jos (jtnz)      Join Date: Sep 2007       05-01-2008, 5:51 PM Reply   
Ahh, good point.
Old    J Wilson (illkid)      Join Date: Sep 2006       05-02-2008, 9:48 AM Reply   
Get a couple of these!

http://www.redtagsports.com/
Old    882001 (882001)      Join Date: Nov 2003       05-02-2008, 2:05 PM Reply   
wow sweet link i picked up 2.
Old     (shredhead)      Join Date: Jun 2003       05-02-2008, 2:54 PM Reply   
Me Too!
Old    Leo Lasecki (malibuboarder75)      Join Date: Jan 2004       05-02-2008, 5:31 PM Reply   
542 for wakeboarding. The 542 by acme was the best upgrade ever for our 2001.

Reply
Share 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 6:54 PM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2012 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us