Wake 101
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WakeWorld Home
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > >> Wakeboarding Discussion Archives > Archive through November 30, 2004

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old    vcamper            09-25-2004, 11:54 PM Reply   
Hey i saw a spread in WBM bout this new liquid force board called the fish. Anyone rode it yet or know anything about it?
Old    alan plotz (alanp)      Join Date: Apr 2001       09-26-2004, 10:54 AM Reply   
mike dick has and posted a review. im pretty excited to get one when they become available. they seem like alot of fun.
Old    Mike D (mike_d)      Join Date: Jul 2004       09-28-2004, 1:08 PM Reply   
We have the 129 and 133 available for demo at California Skier Mastercraft Boats in Lake Elsinore. Some of the employees took it out and said it was a fun board to ride. Lots of pop and very stable to ride.
Old    rammer (craiger)      Join Date: May 2002       09-28-2004, 1:51 PM Reply   
I've never heard of the Fish. Is this their version of Hyperlite's Roam board?
Old    210n            09-28-2004, 2:29 PM Reply   
the fish is the absolute best board ever made, lots of pop, really fast and has a low swing weight so you spin faster too. it's the best board i've ever ridden, along with the new team bindings best setup ever.
Old    210n            09-28-2004, 2:30 PM Reply   
the roam's fun but not as functional as a board that you can actually ride all the time.
Old    vcamper            09-29-2004, 9:43 PM Reply   
It does sound like a cool board, but ive heard that its priced around 450. Kinda expensive for a "fun" board
Old    Chris (whitlecj)      Join Date: Apr 2004       10-03-2004, 6:31 PM Reply   
I rode one this weekend. Sweet ride. Big pop and soft landings. Great board once you get used to its length. I will own one soon.
Old    alan plotz (alanp)      Join Date: Apr 2001       10-03-2004, 7:10 PM Reply   
is it 3 stage or continious? i just dont see paying the price for the thing. dunno though i can catch spring fever pretty quickly.
Old    Randy Murray (wakeripper)      Join Date: Oct 2002       10-04-2004, 11:32 AM Reply   
Got one coming should be here by Wednesday, Think of this set-up 133 Fish and XL Sphynx bindings
Old    Sean (canaday)      Join Date: Dec 2002       10-06-2004, 3:26 PM Reply   
Did you get it yet?
Old    Paul Bernier (wakeriderixi)      Join Date: Jan 2004       10-20-2004, 3:41 PM Reply   
its a fun bored for sure, great pop with super smooth landings.... way to aggressive for me... ive gotta have a really mellow laid back board or i just get worked, i ride a trip.
Old    Sean (canaday)      Join Date: Dec 2002       10-21-2004, 10:03 AM Reply   
It's not very fast
Old    awlang            10-21-2004, 2:13 PM Reply   
Randy, Did you get a good deal on the board? If so, where did you order it?
Old    Ben Holman (riverside)      Join Date: Mar 2002       10-21-2004, 2:46 PM Reply   
obrien already did the small/width setup in 1998 with the phatty.nothing new about this concept except for the fins.they also made a crossover model between the regular boards and phatty..forgot the name though.
p.s i,m not bashing LF i really want to try this fish also.just wanted to say that the idea is not new.
Old    Matt VdA (mvda)      Join Date: Dec 2002       10-21-2004, 2:57 PM Reply   
Ben, you are right that short and fat idea is not new. However, the original short fat board was the LF Squirt in 97. It's pretty cool that Jimmy Redmon (designer of both the Squirt and the Fish) is taking one of his older "new concepts" and combining it with todays shape and fin configuration advances. I was a huge fan of the Squirt and the Super Squirt and am really looking forward to trying out the Fish.
Old    Paul (gherk)      Join Date: Aug 2001       10-21-2004, 3:06 PM Reply   
I just got the 129 and I wasn't too surprised in how it rode. I've been riding the substance for 2 years now and it feels a lot like that except for how loose it is. It has virtually no swing weight and I didn't notice much more pop. The one thing that I did notice the most is how loose while approaching the wake. If you don't set your edge, the board will get loose on you. Also I felt like I had to ride faster to keep it on edge, but that could have just been because of the conditions. It was much better the second set and it does take a little time to get use to it. But that could be said for just about any board. All in all, I like it, but I don't think I'm going to give up my substance.
Old    Paul (gherk)      Join Date: Aug 2001       10-24-2004, 5:40 PM Reply   
Ok I just wanted to follow up on my post. I'm enjoying the board more an more each time out. Yes it is still loose, but not nearly as much as the first time out. Definitely a good popping board, but I personally can't tell a difference between this and my substance. What I am loving is the swing weight and the soft landings. Definitely a keeper.
Old    Chris White (ccwhite)      Join Date: Jul 2004       10-24-2004, 5:58 PM Reply   
Do you think it would soften landings that occur in the flats or on a cased wake?
Old    Paul (gherk)      Join Date: Aug 2001       10-24-2004, 11:22 PM Reply   
Probably both. I wouldn't know about a cased wake since I am always landing 5-10 feet in the flats. hahaha.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 5:08 AM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home


© 2016 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us