Articles
   
       
Pics/Video
       
Wake 101
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WakeWorld Home
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > Non-Wakeboarding Discussion

Share 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old     (hatepain)      Join Date: Aug 2006       04-26-2010, 6:10 PM Reply   
Lawmakers Accuse GM, Administration of Misleading Public Over Loan Repayment

A handful of lawmakers are accusing General Motors of misleading the public by continuing to claim as part of its advertising blitz that the auto giant has repaid its government loans "in full."


A handful of lawmakers are accusing General Motors of misleading the public by continuing to claim as part of its advertising blitz that the auto giant has repaid its government loans "in full."

General Motors has been running ads on all the major networks claiming the company repaid its $6.7 billion U.S. government loan "with interest five years ahead of the original schedule." General Motors Company CEO Ed Whitacre can be seen in the ad walking through an auto plant as he touts the company's progress.

But lawmakers, and even the inspector general for the bailout fund GM borrowed from, point out that General Motors only repaid the bailout money by dipping into a separate pot of bailout money. They say the company did not actually use its own earnings to make the early payment and are questioning why executives are making such a big deal out of it.

"The hype is not the reality," Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote in a column on FoxNews.com over the weekend. "It is far from clear how GM and the Obama administration could honestly say, much less trumpet in prime time television ads, that GM repaid its TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) loans in any meaningful way."

Grassley wrote a letter last week to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner expressing his concerns and asking for more information about why the company was allowed to use bailout money to repay bailout money.

The $6.7 billion is also just a fraction of the $52 billion General Motors received in government aid. Grassley said lawmakers are being told government losses on GM are expected to exceed $30 billion.

The TARP inspector general, Neil Barofsky, bluntly told the Senate Finance Committee during a hearing last week that the repayment "is just other TARP money" and lawmakers should not "exaggerate" the feat.

"It sounds like they're kind of like taking money out of one pocket and putting it in the other to do that," Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., said at the hearing.

Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., expressed similar concerns Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," saying it's "misleading" for the administration to claim the company has paid back its loans.

The GM ad could potentially land the company in trouble with the Federal Trade Commission over its truth-in-advertising laws, which prohibit ads that are "likely to mislead consumers."

The FTC would not comment on the specific GM ad.

General Motors admits that the company is repaying the loan with other government money, but says a year ago "nobody thought we'd be able to pay this back."
Old    bigdtx            04-27-2010, 5:55 AM Reply   
Wait a minute! So you're telling me that a car company is running a TV ad that is not 100% accurate? I'm shocked!
Old     (blabel)      Join Date: Jul 2001       04-27-2010, 6:30 AM Reply   
So does this mean we get the interest back in some sort of tax credit?
Old     (sdub)      Join Date: Jan 2003       04-27-2010, 7:16 AM Reply   
so basically, GM is paying off their Visa Card with their Master Card.....niiiiice. Makes sense, that commercial sounded a bit off.
Old     (zo1)      Join Date: Aug 2002       04-27-2010, 8:02 AM Reply   
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdtx View Post
Wait a minute! So you're telling me that a car company is running a TV ad that is not 100% accurate? I'm shocked!
Seriously... But then again do we really care??? Since they are owned by the people (yea right) and if this false advertising makes some sheeple buy a GM instead of a Toyota, are we not better off?
Old     (sdub)      Join Date: Jan 2003       04-27-2010, 8:19 AM Reply   
^^^ you got a good point. The government does own 60% of post bankrupt GM. I guess doing what ever it takes to get that stock price up might not be that horrible of a strategy.
Old     (magic)      Join Date: Mar 2002       04-27-2010, 8:52 AM Reply   
so they are using the other bail money to pay back their bailout and then use more of that other bailout money to advertise about it...?


Reply
Share 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 2:05 PM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2019 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us