Nautique wake photos

s430luke 10-29-2005, 3:53 PM

Can you please post photos of your 210,211,226 or even 220 wake photos and let me know how you weight up your boats. Thanks

(mikeski) · (mikeski) **Join Date: Aug 2003** 10-29-2005, 4:37 PM

Luke,

Your profile says that you are in boat sales for Nautique and Sanger? It would seem that you would be the best source for wake photo's...

In reality I think photo's of most wakes expecially Nautique's is somewhat pointless. I feel that the shape of the wake is more important than it's size. I nicely shaped wake with a progressive lip like a 210's is not that impressive in photo's. On the other hand pictures of boat's wakes that were not so well shaped look great in photo's.

Just my 2 cents, it may not be worth more...

(talltigeguy) · (talltigeguy) **Join Date: Sep 2003** 10-29-2005, 4:45 PM

I agree 100% with Mikeski, pictures never do a wake justice.

(attila916) · (attila916) **Join Date: Oct 2005** 10-29-2005, 5:00 PM

I agree with Mikeski as well, however I would like to see pics of the X-1 wake compared to a 210 wake with the stock ballast.

(big_ed_x2) · (big_ed_x2) **Join Date: Jul 2004** 10-29-2005, 6:49 PM

They are both NO GOOD stock...they both need about 1000lbs over stock anything more is a plus.

(damned04) · (damned04) **Join Date: May 2005** 10-30-2005, 11:54 AM

I agree with Big Ed, about 1000 over stock makes my 05 X2 wake BIG. Add another 1000 and it get intimidating for some people

(crowmobe540) · (crowmobe540) **Join Date: Mar 2004** 11-01-2005, 2:48 PM

Here is my 2002 210 TE. It has ballast, 200lbs of lead, and 1500 pounds of fat sacs. I also had a couple people in the boat and we were riding in about 85 feet of water. It is a little washy on one side because I like to ride slow. as long as it is clean on the side I am jumping at the time I am fine. It cleans up on whichever side you are on. This is a picture of my friend Griffin. He is about 6 feet tall and rides at 75ft. It is an ok pic, but the guys are correct. the wake looks a lot different in person. A lot steeper and bigger

(crowmobe540) · (crowmobe540) **Join Date: Mar 2004** 11-01-2005, 2:50 PM

Oh yeah, he is riding at about 21.7-22.2 mph on the perfect pass

(greatdane) · (greatdane) **Join Date: Feb 2001** 11-01-2005, 3:09 PM

Thats a huge wake. You could surf that wake!

(attila916) · (attila916) **Join Date: Oct 2005** 11-01-2005, 10:24 PM

anyone have an x-1 wake for comparison?

(damned04) · (damned04) **Join Date: May 2005** 11-02-2005, 7:07 PM

That's my 05 X2 with only stock ballast (not enough), that was a quick session so we didn't fill the ballast

(antbug) · (antbug) **Join Date: Jul 2004** 11-02-2005, 7:58 PM

Attila ~ here is my boys X2(X1) with about the same weight as that sick Nauti wake above

(attila916) · (attila916) **Join Date: Oct 2005** 11-02-2005, 8:45 PM

thanks, that is sweeet!

(scott_a) · (scott_a) **Join Date: Dec 2002** 11-02-2005, 10:35 PM

the rider in the above pic is only about 4 feet tall. just thought i'd make you aware of that...

(antbug) · (antbug) **Join Date: Jul 2004** 11-03-2005, 7:56 AM

Scott ~ not in his mind

(big_ed_x2) · (big_ed_x2) **Join Date: Jul 2004** 11-03-2005, 2:38 PM

C'mon be nice guys......4'2" and a 3\4 inches.

(jcv) · (jcv) **Join Date: Oct 2005** 11-03-2005, 3:10 PM

i bet that guy can fly. being 6'4" was cool when i was playing high school basketball, but i'd love to be shorter and lighter now that i'm officially addicted to wakeboarding

(seattle) · (seattle) **Join Date: Mar 2002** 11-03-2005, 3:12 PM

That and the fact that "He" used to be a "She".

(big_ed_x2) · (big_ed_x2) **Join Date: Jul 2004** 11-03-2005, 3:24 PM

Jeff,you can't tell me you rather be short.....girls don't like short guys.

Cliff......HAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHA