nice one joe
I personally found i liked the recoil better... but i also demoed it more than the responce so i might have not given it a fair chance. one of my reviews in the past i stated that i couldn't tell a difference between the two (probably because i had only ridden each once with a week time gone by between each) and that i would go for a response simply because i liked the '07 graphics better.
I changed my mind when i was stuck with a larger size recoil (142, i normally don't ride bigger than 139) when i rented one for and behalf of a guy near me that i met through wakeworld. The larger board seemed to provide more potential pop... similar as you would get more power from a bigger rubber band.
I have also ridden a response in the larger size but did not find it to be as... uhh... "amazing!" (2nd and last response trial. ive ridden the recoil at least 8 times)
The reason joe points me out is because
the guys in the boat REPORTEDa ridiculous amount of air [("""10-12 ft""")sorry, no pics] HOWEVER, other factors were at play, NAMELY, and extended pylon attached to the top of the tower, so the rope was already over ten feet in the air to begin with. secondly, i attribute the said "max air" to a "lucky pop" (maybe a little natural double up, or just happened to get everything perfect, or...whatever. I don't think i even landed that particualr jump either. i remember several airs were the pop scared me off balance, or maybe it was the "different feeling of pop" that scared me.)
I did ride another board the same day and didn't do nearly as well with it, and did not feel the same impressive pop (but it was my first ride on it vs. my second or so on the recoil)
take the story for what it is worth
and with a grain of salt or more...
MAIN POINT,
don't only consider the recoil vs the response.
consider also the next size up (but only if you are at a size/weight that you fit between the two sizes of consideration. (I would not advocate a 140 lb person to ride a 142 recoil for example)