94 Nautique Excel Any Good?

(wake_upppp) · (wake_upppp) **Join Date: Nov 2003** 03-04-2012, 8:57 AM

Have a friend looking at one. Potential?

(john211) · (john211) **Join Date: Aug 2008** 03-04-2012, 2:30 PM

No personal knowledge, but you did me a favor a year back. Here's what a quick WW search turns up.

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/m...tml?1181588996

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/m...tml?1203039959

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/m...tml?1067642008

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/m...tml?1047661669

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/m...tml?1139605896

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/m...tml?1085883363

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/m...21/277514.html

(MattieK27) · (MattieK27) **Join Date: Mar 2010** 03-04-2012, 6:15 PM

Wake is not bad, slightly sensitive to weight placement. Great rough water boat for the size. A debate still is ongoing if it has fiberglass stringers or uses would. The entire Nautique lineup went to 100% composite in 1993, but the Excel/Barefoot makes no mention of that in any of their brochures or catalogs. Every other boat in the lineup has the composite stringer system denoted as a separate line item. The guys on CorrectCraftFan can't even prove it one way or the other.

Other than that, I heard the surf wake is not very good.

(wake_upppp) · (wake_upppp) **Join Date: Nov 2003** 03-04-2012, 10:32 PM

Thanks guys. I often forget about the "search" feature! lol