Articles
   
       
Pics/Video
       
Wake 101
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WakeWorld Home
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > Video and Photography

Share 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old     (barry)      Join Date: Apr 2002       01-11-2008, 6:16 PM Reply   
Anyone using one? Can you give me the good, bad and ugly with it, please?
I'm really interested in the results combined with the 70-200 2.8 since that's what I plan on using it with.
Old     (Walt)      Join Date: Jan 2003       01-11-2008, 7:10 PM Reply   
I think you lose a stop or two.
Old     (scott_a)      Join Date: Dec 2002       01-11-2008, 7:44 PM Reply   
1.4x = one stop
2.0x = two stops

It worked great with my 70-200 f2.8. I rented one for the Spring Ride last year and it performed as I would expect it to. With the 1.4x your f2.8 becomes an f4, but I believe the camera accounts for this automatically (it would read f4 as lowest f-stop and not f2.8). I didn't shoot any side-by-side shots with it off and on, but I'm sure there are some out there on the internet. I haven't exactly compared the image quality of my shots taken with the extender on and without it, but I do have to say that at first glance, they all look the same. I don't remember any additional "hunting" on the lenses part to find focus, either.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sample-Pictures.aspx?Equipment=112&desc=Canon-EF-1.4x-II-Extender-Sample-Pictures
Old     (richd)      Join Date: Oct 2003       01-12-2008, 8:45 AM Reply   
I've currently got both the Canon 1.4 and a Kenko 300 Pro 1.4X, I've actually stacked them on my 400 f5.6L because the cam still AF's (2nd TC doesn't report) and the IQ is better then a 2X by itself. The advantage of the Canon over the Kenko is slightly better color and better build quality and it's white so it matches your L teles. Canon disadvantages over the Kenko: more expensive, larger-heavier, and won't work with all lens because the canon has a protruding rear flange.

Sharpness is a draw AFAIC based on a bunch of tests I did with both on a 300 f2.8L IS. Both TC's report to the body so as Walt/Scott pointed out you lose 1 stop automatically. Tamron makes a cheaper version that actually doesn't report so your 70-200 f2.8 will still be an f2.8 (at the expense of some sharpness as it's just not built as good). If you are planning on using it a lot and want to squeeze every drop of quality possible get the Canon, if not save some money and get the Kenko because it's 98% of the Canon IQ wise.

A couple of examples with the Canon 1.4: the bird with it on my 70-200 f4 IS and the the DB shot with it on the 400 both shot handheld.


Upload
Upload
Old     (barry)      Join Date: Apr 2002       01-12-2008, 11:40 AM Reply   
Awesome! Thank you...

Reply
Share 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 6:48 PM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2019 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us