Which boat is the best deal?

(lespaul) · (lespaul) **Join Date: May 2007** 05-24-2007, 6:20 PM

Okay, there are three boats that I am considering buying. The first is a 1997 correct craft super sport, nicely outfitted with a tower and stereo and stuff. the next one is a 2000 mastercraft x-5 with an open bow in like new conditions with like 80 hours on it, and the third boat is a 2001 Supra Launch SS in great condition. they all are about the same price give/take a few grand. Which one should I get?

(wakesetter101) · (wakesetter101) **Join Date: Oct 2005** 05-24-2007, 6:30 PM

There are not enough info from you for anyone to tell you witch one is right for you. Test drive and inspect them. Then you tell us. Good luck with your decision.

(mac_attack) · (mac_attack) **Join Date: Oct 2003** 05-24-2007, 6:31 PM

I would skip on the MC.

Nauti is a V-drive & Launch is a DD
Launch is newer.

I think you can't lose with either the SS or the SS.

(sinkoumn) · (sinkoumn) **Join Date: Jan 2007** 05-24-2007, 6:45 PM

Super Sport for sure, I'm biased, but have ridden behind both and the Nautique is the better in my opinion.

(peter_c) · (peter_c) **Join Date: Sep 2001** 05-24-2007, 8:08 PM

Heavily loaded the Supra Sunsport aka Launch produces one of the BIGGEST cleanest wakes I have ever ridden, with a nice transition and a smooth ramp that will launch you to the moon. Of course the Nauty is a great boat too, and that particular hull was one of the best ever produced. The Nautique will use less fuel and produces a wake that is steeper, which is my overall preference, for my riding style.

Was I supposed to mention the MC?

(malibuboarder75)

I love super sports, but I actually agree with Peter. My friend has a 2001 launch and the wake is awesome.

(jwat142) · (jwat142) **Join Date: Jan 2002** 05-25-2007, 4:36 AM

I wouldn't even think twice about buying the super sport. I may be biased too (see profile), but that super sport will throw a SICK wake and it won't take as much weight as that Supra. Plus, the super sport is a v-drive, so you won't have sacs laying around all over your boat like the Supra. I have almost 2000 lbs. in my '97 super sport and you can't see any of it! Also, the GT-40 in that Super Sport is a work horse.

(partyb) · (partyb) **Join Date: Dec 2001** 05-25-2007, 6:46 AM

super sport

(seattle) · (seattle) **Join Date: Mar 2002** 05-25-2007, 7:21 AM

Super Sport,

I wouldn't even consider a direct drive over one.

(jonblarc7) · (jonblarc7) **Join Date: Jul 2006** 05-25-2007, 8:28 AM

Super Sport, I had about the same decision as you have last year minus the MC. I took the Super Sport and haven't looked back.

(bhog) · (bhog) **Join Date: Jul 2006** 05-25-2007, 11:19 AM

Super Sport hands down. Same hull as Super Air up until 2007. YOu will have a pro level wake with about 1300 pounds of ballast. Plus it sounds like it is already loaded. Go for it. How many hours does it have??

(jarrod) · (jarrod) **Join Date: May 2003** 05-25-2007, 11:29 AM

I agree with what has been posted here. The x-5 is probably not the best wake boat in your list.

If you want to get more for your buck, you sholkd consider Sanger too. I LOVE the 215 wake when it's slammed.

(lespaul) · (lespaul) **Join Date: May 2007** 05-25-2007, 1:37 PM

thanks all!

(westsiderippa) · (westsiderippa) **Join Date: Dec 2006** 05-25-2007, 5:38 PM

http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/messages/8/402863.html?1179030150

(lespaul) · (lespaul) **Join Date: May 2007** 05-25-2007, 7:06 PM

Thanks Bryan thats a sweet boat but unfortunately about 20k out of my price range LOL.