weighing 99 pro air nautique

wake47 08-30-2007, 5:47 PM

give me all your opinions, but nothing that is wayyyyy to expensive. i just have 2 200s on the right and left side on the back... help?

(bremsen) · (bremsen) **Join Date: Aug 2005** 08-30-2007, 6:44 PM

Get a sac in the ski locker or up in the bow and add a tube or seat sac in the rear trunk over the stock tanks. IMO that boat reacts better to weight just in front of the engine so I'd start there.

(epic1) · (epic1) **Join Date: Oct 2006** 08-30-2007, 10:58 PM

was the pro air the one that needed little ballest due to hull shape? Could have sworn this was talked about not to long ago.

(bremsen) · (bremsen) **Join Date: Aug 2005** 08-31-2007, 5:56 AM

Yes, its been discussed here several times. CC put steps in the hull with the premise that it would drag the boat into the water at speed but they still included a small ballast system (2x250lb hard tanks). I personally think the pro gets a bad rap and I really enjoy riding behind it. The wake is a bit different compared to the typical nautique wake. It has more transition, almost no trough and isn't quite as steep as a super or 2001 but still has that nice nautique lip.

(malibuboarder75)

I have ridden the Pro with about 1400lbs in it plus a few people. The wake is pretty good. I definately prefer the 210 wake, but the pro air is a good boat.