Articles
   
       
Pics/Video
       
Wake 101
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WakeWorld Home
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > >> Wakeboarding Discussion Archives > Archive through September 27, 2006

Share 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old     (7islands)      Join Date: May 2006       09-03-2006, 4:50 PM Reply   
Is the stance on the transcend still the same mini-me lame maximum of 23.5" or did they change it to atleast 24.5 ?

Thanks
Old     (scws)      Join Date: Sep 2004       09-03-2006, 7:46 PM Reply   
Max of 23.5 for 2007.
Old     (jcv)      Join Date: Oct 2005       09-03-2006, 8:26 PM Reply   
is there a reason for that? like not wanting people to stand on the abrupt rocker putting added stress on their knees?
Old     (7islands)      Join Date: May 2006       09-03-2006, 9:49 PM Reply   
that sucks, 23.5 is way to small for many people...
Old     (bbr)      Join Date: Apr 2002       09-04-2006, 6:06 AM Reply   
It's only an inch!!!!
Old     (ldebbold)      Join Date: Jun 2006       09-04-2006, 9:57 AM Reply   
Does the inch really make that much difference? I was reading some article about several pro riders and their set-ups. As different as they were with equipment, boat speed and line length they all set up their bindings "all the way out". So I thought I would try that and it was just one more hole in each direction but it seemed to make a big difference in the feel: In my case not better, but then I'm no pro rider neither!
Old     (7islands)      Join Date: May 2006       09-04-2006, 10:03 AM Reply   
all the way out is different on most board...
Old     (stephan)      Join Date: Nov 2002       09-04-2006, 11:54 AM Reply   
Have you ever met Andrew? He's like 5'8" on a tall day. Same with Zane, I think he peaks at like 5'6". Then there is the tall pro, Trevor who probably hits 5'10" on a yoga day. Maybe Andrew made it right where he wanted it. I guess I can see how it could be narrow for someone over 6 foot. I usethe 23.5" stance and am only 5'8" on consistent tall days.
Old     (7islands)      Join Date: May 2006       09-04-2006, 12:26 PM Reply   
yeah but they could have made it wider and andrew would have still been able to use his 23.5"
Old     (stephan)      Join Date: Nov 2002       09-04-2006, 2:11 PM Reply   
Or they could have left it right where it is and upset Kevin Boeda.
Old     (dudeman)      Join Date: Mar 2005       09-04-2006, 3:46 PM Reply   
Ask a woman if an inch makes a difference.
Old     (clubmyke)      Join Date: Aug 2004       09-04-2006, 4:06 PM Reply   
LOL !!!!!
Old     (kristian)      Join Date: Nov 2002       09-04-2006, 4:22 PM Reply   
Round of applause to Randy!!!!!!

Post of the day, right there!!!

(Message edited by kristian on September 04, 2006)
Old     (7islands)      Join Date: May 2006       09-04-2006, 6:11 PM Reply   
haha randy nice one...thats the whole point im trying to make
Old     (guido)      Join Date: Jul 2002       09-05-2006, 4:08 PM Reply   
the whole or the hole..... LOL. Sorry.

I rode it and dug it. I've always been an all the way out kinda guy. Had you not said anything I wouldn't have ever noticed.
Old     (ldebbold)      Join Date: Jun 2006       09-05-2006, 4:33 PM Reply   
Way to go, Randy. I walked right into that one.
Old     (riz)      Join Date: Apr 2006       09-06-2006, 12:51 PM Reply   
I just talked to the engineer here at C-Dub and the stance width is 24.5"

Where is it posted that the stance is only at 23.5"?
Old    karvin            09-06-2006, 1:02 PM Reply   
Your engineer was wrong because it says everywhere that the max stance is 23.5"

peace
Old     (riz)      Join Date: Apr 2006       09-06-2006, 1:28 PM Reply   
No-- our literature is wrong that we sent out to everyone- I just watched him measure it to be sure- afterall he designed this board
Old    karvin            09-06-2006, 6:17 PM Reply   
Well even on CWB website they say 23.5
Old     (riz)      Join Date: Apr 2006       09-08-2006, 11:21 AM Reply   
It's been wrong since the first piece of info was written about it. It's 24.5...you can measure it to be sure--but I watched the guy who designed the board measure it right in front of me. --I just checked the 2007 brochure that came in today...it says 23.5 again for the 142cm, but it's really 24.5.
Old    karvin            09-08-2006, 12:51 PM Reply   
what about the 138cm?
Old     (riz)      Join Date: Apr 2006       09-08-2006, 2:17 PM Reply   
Transcend 138 is 24.5 as well.
Absolute 141 is 24.5
absolute 135 is 23.5
Old    karvin            09-08-2006, 2:23 PM Reply   
alright thanks bud
Old     (tracy_marine_proshop)      Join Date: Aug 2006       09-10-2006, 5:55 PM Reply   
RANDY~~an inch makes a difference <= lmmfao

EVAN~ Which whole/hole did you "ride" & dug? n/m lol...........

I know i'm late to the thread, but was just browsing & had to comment.....

Reply
Share 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 AM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2019 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us