Dna or not

Why is it that i see no pros using their dna boards exept for murray is there a problem with them i should know about thanks

They're not as strong as the biolite boards.

You cannot know what board a pro is riding by the graphics.

omg, its the dna discution again... phear for your life...

despite all the oppinion this topic draws, the fact is that DNA boards are considerably lighter, but the biolight are much stronger. I'm reasonably new to wakeboaring, i don't go huge into the air yet or ever hit sliders, so when i got a deal on a dna premier i jumped on it. if you take tricks really big and do hit sliders then biolite is probably a beter bet.

as for your question, there is nothing inherantly wrong with DNA, just understand what you are getting and its limitations. Also, Troy is rite, the pros can get whatever graphics they jolly well feel like stamped on their boards, so you can't really tell there.

if i am wrong in any of this feel free to correct me, i'm just passing on what i've picked up thus far into wakeboarding. peace

I always wondered why pros never rode the lighter core versions of wakeboards, but I never thought they might just right the light core models with the regular core graphics. I would want to ride the lighter version to spin easier, and plus balsa cores have more pop.