 |
Join Date: May 2004
08-08-2005, 7:51 AM
|
Reply
|
|
Just curious as too who has a pretty fat wake pic.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
08-11-2005, 7:27 PM
|
Reply
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
08-11-2005, 7:49 PM
|
Reply
|
behind my i/o 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
08-11-2005, 8:26 PM
|
Reply
|
Behind a 23 Wakesetter LSV 
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
08-11-2005, 8:36 PM
|
Reply
|
super air  wakesetter  another wakesetter 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
08-11-2005, 8:40 PM
|
Reply
|
X2 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
08-11-2005, 8:43 PM
|
Reply
|
X-star 
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
08-11-2005, 8:43 PM
|
Reply
|
|
Well, I know Clint is full of it cause that wake just keeps bigger all the time. However, Rich, is that for real?
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
08-11-2005, 8:47 PM
|
Reply
|
210 
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
08-11-2005, 8:56 PM
|
Reply
|
|
What in the H$#@! Clint that isnt a wake thats a tsunami!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
08-11-2005, 9:01 PM
|
Reply
|
|
I never gave it a chance to be honest, but the wakesetter LSV seems to be the winner here
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weatherford, Texas
08-11-2005, 9:08 PM
|
Reply
|
|
Clint,
Damn!!! That's huge. What are you feeding that thing?
-Blake
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
08-11-2005, 9:10 PM
|
Reply
|
|
not to take anything away from lsv's, but...
how can you say that the lsv is the winner? for 1, the shot is from the side...the opposite side of the rider, at that. also, there seems to be some rollers in the pic which sometimes skews the size of the wake (ie; double-up). also, the boat appears to be turning away from the bridge. the inside wake is usually bigger in a turn (ie; double-up).
(Message edited by dakid on August 11, 2005)
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
08-11-2005, 9:32 PM
|
Reply
|
|
yeah, if you look, all the pics where the wake looks giant, you can only see 1 side, or there is a funny angle. Notice that when you take a normal photo (like just from the boat), where you can see both wakes, the wake looks way more realistic.
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
08-11-2005, 9:33 PM
|
Reply
|
|
P.S. Show me a wake like Clint's with both wakes in sight, going a normal speed, and I will personally come and give you a high five.
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
08-11-2005, 10:04 PM
|
Reply
|
|
Joe that first pic is that maryjanes wake? I added another 350 to the back so she is kicking know.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
08-11-2005, 10:06 PM
|
Reply
|
yes, that would be none other than squid's wake! another 350??? i don't think i'll be riding behind your boat anytime soon...my knees won't appreciate it! 
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
08-11-2005, 10:25 PM
|
Reply
|
|
haha, no I put some more in the front to give it a little longer trany. Good Times we had back then. You need to come up here again when the lakes settle down and we can get some good water all day long.
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
08-11-2005, 10:26 PM
|
Reply
|
|
we're headin' up for labor day weekend. beyond that, i have no idea when we'll be up again!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
08-11-2005, 10:33 PM
|
Reply
|
|
ok cool, ya staying with hen dog. Maybe we can hook up its been a long time.
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
08-12-2005, 1:25 AM
|
Reply
|
V210 
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
08-12-2005, 6:24 AM
|
Reply
|
|
I think Rich's Wakesetter wake may be for real and it could be that big. Reason why I say this is that I saw a couple of pictures on another thread a few months back that showed his boat sitting in the water loaded down and I have never seen a boat sitting that low in the water. He had like 10 people in it and God only knows how much ballast. The Malibu tribal graphic was more than halfway under water and the water line was getting near the Wakesetter decal on the back. It was a camo paint job I think.
Anyway, it could be some kind of picture taken during a turn like Joe stated above (Which makes sense as there is a bridge right there) but if anyboat was going to kick up a wake that big, it would be this for sure given how much weight was in the thing. You gotta have ton of weight in a 23ft boat to get it sit down that low...maybe dude will post some more pics.
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
08-12-2005, 6:57 AM
|
Reply
|
|
Alot of meaty wakes in this thread, my mouth is foaming. Shawn, that sanger wakes looks very nice.
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
08-12-2005, 7:10 AM
|
Reply
|
|
holy crap clint, i'm gonna need some insight! looks like it belongs on snow it's so big. is your i/o a 60 ft yacht?
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
08-12-2005, 7:20 AM
|
Reply
|
|
clint looks like he's got a quarter pipe there, damn.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
08-12-2005, 7:36 AM
|
Reply
|
97 Super Sport... 
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
08-12-2005, 9:12 AM
|
Reply
|
|
Thanks Pierce, after that day there was not even a hint of buyers remorse. :-)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
08-12-2005, 9:16 AM
|
Reply
|
|
I cant believe people think that wake that clint posted is real? Its posted on here every so often.
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
08-12-2005, 9:19 AM
|
Reply
|
|
i know it's not real, im just curious as to what it is.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
08-12-2005, 9:35 AM
|
Reply
|
|
Someone stated before that it was a Sanger wake that has been Shopped.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
08-12-2005, 11:39 AM
|
Reply
|
Nay sayers about the LSV.....check out www.waterskiamerica.com look for the Legends of Ray Hubbard to see the video.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
08-12-2005, 11:40 AM
|
Reply
|
heres an 04 Mobius LSV 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
08-12-2005, 11:44 AM
|
Reply
|
another 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
08-12-2005, 1:06 PM
|
Reply
|
'05 LSV w/ stock ballast 
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
08-12-2005, 1:30 PM
|
Reply
|
I can vouche for the wake on the camo LSV as being ridiculously big. We share lines all the time and Chris' rollers do a number on our boat. In fact, we're in the background of one of the pics Rich is posting. He sinks that boat and has the 8.1L. Like nothing I've ever seen before. His riding isn't too shabby either. 
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
08-14-2005, 11:41 AM
|
Reply
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
08-14-2005, 11:43 AM
|
Reply
|
03 VLX side by side with Zacks 02' X-star. Notice that its as tall as he is. Gotta love it 
|
|
Linear Mode
