Hi folks, just wanted to get your opinions on what you feel is a better deal in terms of total value between two boats that I am looking at. Both boats are the same gelcoat scheme.
2008 Supra 21v 0 hrs $43k
- 340hp ETX CAT motor
- Swivel racks
- Stock ballast
- Stock Kenwood stereo
- Tandem trailer with swing-away tongue and spare, boat buddy
- 4 yr. warranty
- Tower Mirror
- Altitude prop
There is no bimini, no covers, no light bar, no tower speakers. About as stock as you can get it. But it does have the motor I want.
2007 Supra 21v 80 hrs. $41.5k or B/O
- Remainder of 4 yr warranty
- 340 hp ETX CAT motor
- Stock Kenwood stereo
- Swivel racks
- Tower speakers
- Stock Ballast
- Tandem trailer with swing-away tongue and spare, can't tell from pics if it has boat buddy
- Tower and docking lights
- Storage and Travel covers
- Bimini
- Comes with 2 boards, Ronix and Hyperlite
I am really not looking to spend more than $40k and I think the 2007 seems like a better deal for me even though there's more warranty on the 2008. I would have to spend a couple thousand for the options that I want on the 2008 (i.e. tower speakers, bimini, covers, tower lights, etc.) I'd really like to have the Z5 cargo rack but neither does, and i can always add that at a later time. On the other hand having a boat with ZERO hours and a fully warranty is REAL NICE! Both sellers are not that flexible on price. THe 2008 will go down as low as $43k and I think I can get the 2007 down to $39k.
Any advice? What are your thoughts? Perhaps I am not thinking of something that you all might bring up as good points to consider.