Articles
   
       
Pics/Video
       
Wake 101
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WakeWorld Home
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > Boats, Accessories & Tow Vehicles

Share 
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old     (fozz)      Join Date: Apr 2011       06-05-2011, 10:36 AM Reply   
According to the table published by ARC Audio, the 300.2 is much more efficient, while delivering the same power. Is this a typo? See page 14 of the below PDF.

http://www.arcaudio.com/product-pdf/KS300_24-V2.pdf

I am running four tower speakers, each at 4 ohms. I was planning on running a 300.4 bridged in stereo mode. But after looking at ARC's specs, I would be much better off running a 300.2 in mono mode at 4 ohms.

Because of the environment and lack of space between the speakers, I see no benefit to running these speakers in stereo.... Especially considering how much more efficient the 300.2 is supposed to be. This should equate to being much easier on my electrical system and giving me an extended play period.


Summary of the info on ARC's website:

300. 2 Power Output at 4Ohm Bridged: 700 watts @ 68A, Eff 71%

300.4 Power Output at 4Ohm Bridged: 350 watts x 2, @ 132A, Eff 53%


It appears that the 300.2 is more efficient at all impedance loads... Does this make sense?

 
Share 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:50 AM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2019 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us