Wake 101
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WakeWorld Home
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > Boats, Accessories & Tow Vehicles

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old     (rexlex01)      Join Date: Mar 2010       01-16-2013, 7:28 PM Reply   
What! eom

Last edited by rexlex01; 01-16-2013 at 7:34 PM.
Old     (boardman74)      Join Date: Jul 2012       01-16-2013, 7:54 PM Reply   
Unweighted? Neither are going to have much of anything unweighted!!
Old     (rexlex01)      Join Date: Mar 2010       01-16-2013, 8:12 PM Reply   
Which one?
Old     (bwake)      Join Date: Sep 2009       01-17-2013, 1:20 AM Reply   
Just buy a Sanger V210.
Old     (williamburell)      Join Date: Sep 2011       01-17-2013, 4:30 AM Reply   
They'd both have decent ski wakes
Old     (tripsw)      Join Date: May 2006       01-18-2013, 7:05 PM Reply   
Old     (Ski_Antique)      Join Date: May 2013       06-15-2013, 8:00 PM Reply   
It's not that expensive to get two fat sacs and a pump. Here's a pic from this weekend. 1984 SN2001 w/800lbs ballast and 3 people in the boat.
Attached Images

Last edited by Ski_Antique; 06-15-2013 at 8:01 PM. Reason: clarification
Old     (johnny_defacto)      Join Date: Sep 2006       06-15-2013, 9:33 PM Reply   
lol. I love how nobody (except for Sander) answers his direct, yet simple question. Everyone just offers up some random piece of information or suggestion. So in the spirit of solidarity, I will throw out one more useless opinion as I do not know the answer to the question:

You should get an MB... you can fill or empty in less than 60 seconds, blah blah blah, bang for buck something.....
Old     (alcarlaw1)      Join Date: Jun 2007       06-16-2013, 11:18 AM Reply   
I have a 97 Sport. Unweighted, the wake would be terrible for boarding. Cant answer re the 2001 Nautique. Going down the route of useless info, I have around 1400lbs in the Sport and the wake is as large as I need.
Old     (wakebordr11)      Join Date: May 2001       06-16-2013, 11:38 AM Reply   
They will probably be similar. The sport probably makes a slightly larger wake due to it being marginally bigger/heavier?

With regards to everyone saying stock wakes without weight suck or unridable... My buddies stock 2001 wake doesn't keep me from doing all my tricks, and it shouldn't stop you either... Byerly didn't even use a pole back in 95... Learn how to generate pop on a small wake and you will boost higher than you ever thought possible on a big wake. I see so many people riding lazy these days on big wakes, but if only they had a G23 then they'd boost 7 foot airs...

Sorry for the hate, haven't ridden lately and lots of rain in the NE
Old     (ralph)      Join Date: Apr 2002       06-16-2013, 12:32 PM Reply   
I find it quite an odd question, what super car is faster with no petrol, the Ferrari 456 or Porsche GT2?
Old     (e_rock32)      Join Date: Oct 2009       06-16-2013, 9:10 PM Reply   
2001 will be better unweighted because it's smaller, but with weight it cannot get as big as the sport can. I have a 95 sport, and it throws a great wake, but you have to add a lot of weight to get the pro level wakes like the old 210 has. If it was a choice between boats, definitely choose the sport, and just get the extra ballast bags and pumps.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 8:12 AM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home


© 2016 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us