Articles
   
       
       
Pics/Video
   
       
       
Shop
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
WAKE WORLD HOME
Email Password
Go Back   WakeWorld > >> Boats, Accessories & Tow Vehicles Archive > Archive through July 28, 2009

Share 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old    naych bounleuth (naych)      Join Date: Oct 2006       07-07-2009, 2:39 PM Reply   
Hey guys,
I need a bias opinion on a 1996 Malibu sunsetter lx and a 1998 mastercraft prostar 190...looking to use for mainly wakeboarding..Also need to know if my 2005 mitsubishi rated a 3500 max tow will have any problems towing it...boat says 2800lb dry ..any feedback with be appreciated..looking to get it this weekend..

naych
Old    corey king (snowboardcorey)      Join Date: Jan 2004       07-07-2009, 2:40 PM Reply   
I'm an MC guy but I'd take a sunsetter over a 190 for wakeboarding. The 190 will work but its a purpose built ski boat, the sunsetter will have a little more freeboard, open bow and more space for ballast.
Old    Michael Hunter (mhunter)      Join Date: Mar 2008       07-07-2009, 2:47 PM Reply   
I dont think you will get much of a wake out of a 190 its primarily a ski boat.You will be maxing out your Mitsu, Boat 2800lbs, trailer 1000lbs plus,fuel and gear 500-700lbs. 4300-4500 lbs?
Old    rod (rodltg2)      Join Date: Oct 2005       07-07-2009, 2:53 PM Reply   
i'd say sunsetter. The 1998 MC190 is a purpose built slalom boat but it sucks at it. so you wouldnt even be able to sell it to a slalom skier either!
Old    naych bounleuth (naych)      Join Date: Oct 2006       07-07-2009, 2:59 PM Reply   
wow....awesome responce guys..thank you...

michael: thanks for the info..didnt know trailer weigh much...made my mine on boat but now might need to upgrade the car...

naych
Old    naych bounleuth (naych)      Join Date: Oct 2006       07-07-2009, 3:02 PM Reply   
thanks guys for the quick responce..help me to decide easily...now problem is the car....never easy....

naych
Old    Brett Yates (polarbill)      Join Date: Jun 2003       07-07-2009, 3:36 PM Reply   
I remember a few years ago that people were using the 95-97/98 prostar as a wakeboarding boat. If I remember correctly it had a very similar hull to the 205/205V. Not sure if the 98 190 was the same hull as the 95-97. If it is I am sure it is capable of throwing a good wake. that being said I think the Sunsetter LX is the same or similar hull to the early 2000's VLX. It also has a ton more room and an open bow. For those reasons I would go with the Sunsetter unless the 190 is significantly closer to your budget.
Old    Craig Cox (wakedoctor)      Join Date: Dec 2004       07-08-2009, 9:26 AM Reply   
The model you are talking about is the 205 hull it is an open bow boat and a foot or two longer I think.
Old    Brett Yates (polarbill)      Join Date: Jun 2003       07-08-2009, 10:09 AM Reply   
Craig, I know what the 205 hull is. That is the one I was comparing it to. After looking at pics of a 98 190 it looks to be different than the 95-97 190. The 95-97 190 has a very similar hull to the 205. It is just a smaller scale. This means it should put out a similar shaped wake with a little less ballast. It will just be a more narrow wake. I could be wrong though. But I don't think so.
Old    A-dub (behindtheboat)      Join Date: Aug 2006       07-08-2009, 10:23 AM Reply   
It is different, that's the year they changed it and it had huge, peaky wakes. If you want a closed bow boat for wakeboarding, get a 98 Prostar 190. Sacked out and towered, I would put good money that it's hull will produce a better wake than the Sunsetter. Those Sunsetters didn't really push that much water. Like rod kind of said, the 190 was meant to be a slalom boat, but they didn't do that well. However I would disagree, because I rode one a while back and it was as nice as most "wakeboard" boats. If you want an open bow, get an open bow. If you want a better wake, IMO the 190 would be the choice. A 19skier would be the same thing in a newer model
Old    Clint (ttuclint)      Join Date: Sep 2003       07-08-2009, 10:31 AM Reply   
"I would put good money that it's hull will produce a better wake than the Sunsetter"


So exactly how much money are you gonna put on a 98 Prostar 190 having a better wake than a 2004 VLX ?
Old    Bill K (bill_airjunky)      Join Date: Apr 2002       07-08-2009, 10:47 AM Reply   
The 98 Prostar was the one that had hull problems that MC "fixed" with the rudder & 4th skeg. The rumor at the time was that the boat chine locked & slid off the test lake during the AWSA approval testing..... TWICE! MC only made that boat for 2 yrs.... wonder why. Look it up for yourself. But I'd stay clear of that boat for that reason alone.

The Sunsetter is a descent all around boat that you can use for boarding for a long time without any problems. Plus it's a bow rider. If you were comparing the Sunsetter to the 98 205, I'd say you can't go wrong with either boat. But run away from the 190 in that year.

(Message edited by bill_airjunky on July 08, 2009)
Old    A-dub (behindtheboat)      Join Date: Aug 2006       07-08-2009, 1:09 PM Reply   
Clint, since he was talking a 96 Sunsetter, that's the one I would put my money against. VLX is a v-drive anyway, he's talking direct-drives. I would put your boat ahead of them all of course.

Don't try and power turn right before shore. You won't have a problem with the Prostar.

(Message edited by behindtheboat on July 08, 2009)
Old    Clint (ttuclint)      Join Date: Sep 2003       07-08-2009, 4:25 PM Reply   
96 Sunsetter = exact same hull as up to 2004 VLX is why I said that.
Old    Bill K (bill_airjunky)      Join Date: Apr 2002       07-08-2009, 4:27 PM Reply   
It doesn't take a power turn to chine lock a boat. And if you have the band aids that were available for the 98 PS190, then it's not likely to do it anyway. But would you want a boat that is band aided together when you have other proven options???
Old    Craig Cox (wakedoctor)      Join Date: Dec 2004       07-08-2009, 4:44 PM Reply   
Sorry Brett. I misunderstood.

Bill do you have experience with this boat?

Reply
Share 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:07 PM.

Home   Articles   Pics/Video   Gear   Wake 101   Events   Community   Forums   Classifieds   Contests   Shop   Search
Wake World Home

 

© 2012 eWake, Inc.    
Advertise    |    Contact    |    Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |    Report Abuse    |    Conduct    |    About Us