WakeWorld (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Non-Wakeboarding Discussion (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4387)
-   -   Edwards (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=793661)

psudy 05-31-2012 2:09 PM

Not sure about the rest of you, but if a jury of my peers came out of deliberation and only had a verdict on one of the six charges against me, I would be a little worried about their competency.

fly135 05-31-2012 2:24 PM

Why would you think that a group of 12 random individuals who were filtered to make sure none thought for themselves would display any competency? The fact that they didn't reach a verdict suggests maybe some people who do think for themselves slipped in by accident.

I think the campaign finance law thing is a bit slippery. He certainly had motivation to hide his actions from his wife. So claiming that his motivation was to hide it from the voting public is speculative. You can't just be throwing people in jail for being s**tbags.

psudy 05-31-2012 2:27 PM


This is what I was referring to. They had to be ordered to keep deliberating. oh! One out of six won't work?

ndh2o 05-31-2012 2:58 PM

Just returned not guilty on that charge, and mistrial on the rest.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 1:04 AM.