WakeWorld

WakeWorld (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Boats, Accessories & Tow Vehicles (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=3183)
-   -   Bwuahahahaaha (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=793422)

mhunter 06-06-2012 9:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmyd (Post 1757734)
Yeah, and some guys like mini vans, Ill take the Ferrari

Me to unless I needed to transport a family of 5 and go shopping. But if you are only going to park it in a garage [party cove] and look at it then I suppose the looks is what matters most .

boomshot 06-06-2012 3:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwb4me (Post 1757645)
Is that why we have seen so many build threads? Or are the owners so proud of their boats they don't waste their time on WW?;)

I don't know what you mean, or what your point is.
To be honest, I am collecting pictures of all G23's built, and I only know of 7 completed boats!

And I may be off by 2.

lionel 06-06-2012 11:09 PM

What's up with this rumor?

http://www.themalibucrew.com/forums/..._fromsearch__1

Orange 06-07-2012 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kybool (Post 1757375)
Biased censorship for marketing purposes disqualifies them from being a credible forum. Just shut it down.

Totally disagree. Mastercraft, Nautique, Malibu, etc. all deserve their own forums as they are a great way for their boats owners to share brand and model specific information - stuff like repair tips, how a particular feature functions, or a local repair shop or dealers reputation. Many owners will also trade non-specific information similar to what you find here because they develop a kinship with other forum users or just don't want to monitor two forums. Manufacturers are encouraged to do this to create a better ownership experience and brand loyalty for their customers, and of course it's their right not to have post inflammatory information. Many companies, not just boats, do the same thing and none of them are completely uncensored... And that's totally fair. Most try to allow healthy criticism and disagreement for fear of alienating their existing customers by creating the impressn the company lies or is untrustworthy.

Wakeworld could do something similar - have specific sections for each manufacturer where owners share brand specific repairs and advice. It would have the advantae of being completely unbiased, but I have an idea it would spiral downhill very quickly as brand haters would like bombard the other manufactuerer sections. I think in the end it makes much more sense for each manufacturer to have their own site and police it as they think appropriate.

Houstonshark 06-07-2012 4:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mhunter (Post 1757801)
Me to unless I needed to transport a family of 5 and go shopping. But if you are only going to park it in a garage [party cove] and look at it then I suppose the looks is what matters most .

It makes sense that you would drive a minivan...which reminds me:

http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/m...8/75fa1920.jpg

06-07-2012 6:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lionel (Post 1757993)

Id start a new thread prob to keep this on topic. Oh hell i just realized the guys are already bickering about minivans so hey why not stay in the thread.

Id venture to say this was one of the first few boats out that the riders have and is also used as a demo boat. If theres been 7 boats made I see tht none have made their way to an actual customer yet.

shawndoggy 06-07-2012 6:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orange (Post 1757999)
Totally disagree. Mastercraft, Nautique, Malibu, etc. all deserve their own forums as they are a great way for their boats owners to share brand and model specific information - stuff like repair tips, how a particular feature functions, or a local repair shop or dealers reputation. Many owners will also trade non-specific information similar to what you find here because they develop a kinship with other forum users or just don't want to monitor two forums. Manufacturers are encouraged to do this to create a better ownership experience and brand loyalty for their customers, and of course it's their right not to have post inflammatory information. Many companies, not just boats, do the same thing and none of them are completely uncensored... And that's totally fair. Most try to allow healthy criticism and disagreement for fear of alienating their existing customers by creating the impressn the company lies or is untrustworthy.

Wakeworld could do something similar - have specific sections for each manufacturer where owners share brand specific repairs and advice. It would have the advantae of being completely unbiased, but I have an idea it would spiral downhill very quickly as brand haters would like bombard the other manufactuerer sections. I think in the end it makes much more sense for each manufacturer to have their own site and police it as they think appropriate.

Totally agree that brand specific sites have their place. But the user experience is much better when it's uncensored. Themalibucrew, for instance, is not owned by Malibu and there are PLENTY of critical threads there.

When a manufacturer deletes or prohibits threads that are critical of the brand, it makes it LOOK like there is something to hide (whether there is something to hide or not).

boomshot 06-07-2012 6:43 AM

I believe that none of the G23's have reached a customer yet - all have been test mules, run & junks, or team boats.
A couple are close to going out though.
I know nothing of "grenading" transmissions.
I know for certain that there was an issue with one of the 2 first boats everyone saw. Nobody was talking about what exactly happened.
Whispers of engine problems was all I ever got. Which is no biggie if you think about it.

bjames 06-07-2012 8:14 AM

Im courious to see if some people on this forum will continue to point the spot light at the X-Star wake, but turn a blind eye to potential hull cracks and transmission failiures on the G23.

Lets face it, I see no differece between both boats. They are both brand new high end designs that Im pretty confidnt will both experience growing pains.

06-07-2012 8:30 AM

So the 1st boat off the pre production line loaded w/ 10,000lbs of ballast, gear & people the weekend before was probably the culprit messing up the tranny. Better to catch it on boat #1 a month before actual production begins.

Im not taking sides but i think they still hadnt put the boat through the hard runs yet and luckily they had the backup green/black one w/ the 550 at the stop.

tke104 06-07-2012 8:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boomshot (Post 1757620)
I can't get over how forward-looking the design of the G23 is. Especially in that similar shot to the X-Star.

The X-Star looks like a nice iterative jump over the last X-Star and maybe most boats, even the Super Air Nautique 230 and the Wakesetters.

But the G23 isn't iterative. It looks like Correct Craft said "f#ck it, we're doing it like this now."

...and for that, they won big. Payoff is already happening. My little bird says they can't make them fast enough and have needed to double-up on quality assurance because the few G23's they are building, they are building fast. Faster than they've ever bult boats, he said.

I agree that the G23 is not an iteration of the 230 or 210; however, it definitely follows the same general lines, save for the bow, of CC's newer boats, i.e. the 200 and sport 200. I really like the way that they are going with their styling (more angles, less curves), as opposed to the rounded stern boats like this guy:

http://www.correctcraftboats.com/200...s/2004.h16.jpg

06-07-2012 11:39 AM

As far as motor/transmission trouble, Point the finger at PCM. Nautique does not make, machine, or assemble motors in their boats. Same goes to every other manufacturer. Same would go for illmor if it happened in a MC. Thats not the boat manufacturer's fault. As far as the G23's rolling off the line, Buxton Marine here in Lewisville got one last week.

bjames 06-07-2012 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9Drozd (Post 1758153)
As far as motor/transmission trouble, Point the finger at PCM. Nautique does not make, machine, or assemble motors in their boats. Same goes to every other manufacturer. Same would go for illmor if it happened in a MC. Thats not the boat manufacturer's fault. As far as the G23's rolling off the line, Buxton Marine here in Lewisville got one last week.

Reminds me of a Sea Ray or Chapperal:p

bjames 06-07-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9Drozd (Post 1758153)
As far as motor/transmission trouble, Point the finger at PCM. Nautique does not make, machine, or assemble motors in their boats. Same goes to every other manufacturer. Same would go for illmor if it happened in a MC. Thats not the boat manufacturer's fault. As far as the G23's rolling off the line, Buxton Marine here in Lewisville got one last week.

May not be the components, but its the implementation of a design that fall on the MFG. Just sayin :)

boomshot 06-07-2012 1:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tke104 (Post 1758065)
I agree that the G23 is not an iteration of the 230 or 210; however, it definitely follows the same general lines, save for the bow, of CC's newer boats, i.e. the 200 and sport 200. I really like the way that they are going with their styling (more angles, less curves), as opposed to the rounded stern boats like this guy:

I don't see anything but a faint, passing family resemblance in the G23 - to anything currently in Correct Craft's model lineup. I can't put it any more simply than that. Only the graphics tie in to anything recent as far as I am concerned.

ixfe 06-07-2012 1:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shawndoggy (Post 1758022)
Totally agree that brand specific sites have their place. But the user experience is much better when it's uncensored. Themalibucrew, for instance, is not owned by Malibu and there are PLENTY of critical threads there.

When a manufacturer deletes or prohibits threads that are critical of the brand, it makes it LOOK like there is something to hide (whether there is something to hide or not).

Wakeworld is not immune to censorship. I once had a thread deleted because a "third party" called and complained... so Dave killed it.

The bottom line is this... every forum owner has financial stakeholders and when we piss them off, cencorship will happen.

jimmyd 06-08-2012 5:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boomshot (Post 1758026)
I believe that none of the G23's have reached a customer yet - all have been test mules, run & junks, or team boats.
A couple are close to going out though.
I know nothing of "grenading" transmissions.
I know for certain that there was an issue with one of the 2 first boats everyone saw. Nobody was talking about what exactly happened.
Whispers of engine problems was all I ever got. Which is no biggie if you think about it.

The minivan couldn't take corners when it was loaded up with precious cargo, so they needed to adjust a few things so that tug boat could turn.

tn_rider 06-08-2012 5:51 AM

New alliance video out with Harley riding...w2w double tantrum w2w crow 9..insanity

andrew_moreton 06-08-2012 7:04 AM

Here's the link to the Alliance video if you don't want to search for it.

http://www.alliancewake.com/wake/har...-home-stretch/

craigtxmc 06-08-2012 9:45 AM

That dude is dirty

stoked_32 06-08-2012 2:38 PM

The G23 doesn't have it's own wedding cake topper yet does it?

New Xstar: 1 G23: 0

http://www.etsy.com/listing/98621612...earch_type=all

Sorry... Figured this thread has gone to sh*t anyways. I'm getting married and found this by accident. I apologize.

... although, looks like they accurately depicted the wake... j/p ; )

06-08-2012 3:22 PM

Im in the wrong business if theyre sellin that crap for $200!!

No wonder u guys r buying all these new boats all the time. Chatt prob sells these things as a hobby:)

stoked_32 06-08-2012 5:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LR3w8kbrdr (Post 1758639)
Im in the wrong business if theyre sellin that crap for $200!!

No wonder u guys r buying all these new boats all the time. Chatt prob sells these things as a hobby:)

Originally it was affordable, then she put the mastercraft logo on it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 AM.