WakeWorld

WakeWorld (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Archive through September 10, 2007 (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=500944)
-   -   weighing 99 pro air nautique (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=495646)

08-30-2007 5:47 PM

give me all your opinions, but nothing that is wayyyyy to expensive. i just have 2 200s on the right and left side on the back... help?

bremsen 08-30-2007 6:44 PM

Get a sac in the ski locker or up in the bow and add a tube or seat sac in the rear trunk over the stock tanks. IMO that boat reacts better to weight just in front of the engine so I'd start there.

epic1 08-30-2007 10:58 PM

was the pro air the one that needed little ballest due to hull shape? Could have sworn this was talked about not to long ago.

bremsen 08-31-2007 5:56 AM

Yes, its been discussed here several times. CC put steps in the hull with the premise that it would drag the boat into the water at speed but they still included a small ballast system (2x250lb hard tanks). I personally think the pro gets a bad rap and I really enjoy riding behind it. The wake is a bit different compared to the typical nautique wake. It has more transition, almost no trough and isn't quite as steep as a super or 2001 but still has that nice nautique lip.

malibuboarder75 08-31-2007 7:23 AM

I have ridden the Pro with about 1400lbs in it plus a few people. The wake is pretty good. I definately prefer the 210 wake, but the pro air is a good boat.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 6:05 AM.