WakeWorld

WakeWorld (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Archive through September 10, 2007 (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=500944)
-   -   Tige RZ2 w/Metcraft tower. Thoughts? (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=488025)

deltadave 08-12-2007 3:29 PM

Hey guys! I wanted to see what everyone thought of the RZ2 in this color and the look of the Metcraft tower on it. I think the color and tower looks sick. Does the Metcraft tower on this boat look better than the Tige tower?<img src="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/messages/65921/488026.jpg" alt="Upload">

tyboarder03 08-12-2007 3:38 PM

Yes it does!!! Thats the first time I've seen that, and it just seems to fit the color scheme way better... but I'm partial to metcraft towers. I think they look sick. Is that an option through tige or what?

want2ridealot 08-12-2007 4:20 PM

Do you like the wake behind the RZ2. I think that is one of the coolest looking boats out there but i am partial to the wake. Of course wakes are preference. That tower does look sick though.

timmyb 08-12-2007 6:04 PM

I think the front tubes look out of place on that tower but that's just me. I really like that color combo though! The wake gets better with ballast (just like any boat).

want2ridealot 08-12-2007 6:29 PM

We had 14 people and like 2000 lbs and it was ok. but thats just what we thought. We also had to go about 25 but it was still a little washy but it was HUGE and rock hard.

malibuboarder75 08-12-2007 6:48 PM

I like the original tower better. Ren, have you ridden behind one? I thought the wake was really good with the 1400lbs of ballast and 5 people.

04gravitygames 08-12-2007 8:35 PM

how is the front end with dipping. i know the M/C is a bow dipper. DOes the RZ2 take water over the front easy

want2ridealot 08-12-2007 8:55 PM

yea I rode behind it at a comp but it wasn't weighted too much maybe close to 1000. It was really firm and wide. I was watching the outlaw riders when it was weighted like that and got it from their experience but I trust their opinions.

want2ridealot 08-12-2007 8:58 PM

A lot of us ride behind Malibus so it most likely just a different kind of wake. but I love the way this boat looks. It really stands out with it's squared off feel and flat panels. It looks real aggressive and edgy.

pierce_bronkite 08-13-2007 7:52 AM

Chris, it doesn't take water over the bow like the X Star. However if you have a lot of weight in the bow, like any slammed boat you do have to be careful of any oncoming rollers. <BR> <BR>Personally I like the Z tower better but I am biased.

ssteele013 08-14-2007 8:32 AM

Im with Pierce on that one, the RZ doesn't take on near as much water, the bow sits up quite a bit higher than the Xstar.

acurtis_ttu 08-14-2007 8:37 AM

That tower is close to a $3k option isn't it??? <BR>Had a friend who just picked up an 08, I thought the boat handled hands down better than any other boat I've driven of it's size ( 06 x-star, 07 22SSV). very impressed.

ron_mexico 08-14-2007 12:21 PM

styling wise...i would say the rz2 is the most progressive and edgy of wakeboats i saw at the boat show. i don't know much about the handling or wet factor.

dabell 08-14-2007 12:30 PM

The handling of the rz2 is very good from what I have heard. Getting a roller over the bow does take a lot of work but can't just be done easily....

talltigeguy 08-14-2007 12:37 PM

Personally, I love that tower. I think it looks nice and it is very very solid. <BR> <BR>It is about 8 inches lower than the TIge tower, so it still is over 6 feet from the floor, but too low for me to feel comfortable.

timmyb 08-14-2007 1:23 PM

It's easy to take a roller over the nose of the RZ2 if your driver turns the wrong side when you have it setup for surfing. <img src="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/clipart/lol.gif" border=0> My brother did that once with mine. He has since learned the <i>right</i> way to pickup the rider.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM.