We've been trying all different combinations of weighting and I've referenced the following thread - <BR><a href="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/messages/87668/167460.html" target="_blank">http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/messages/87668/167460.html</a> <BR> <BR>I've upgraded the sacs to the pro-x 750's in the rear and the 1200 up front. Right now the best setup we've gotten is fill the non-drivers side to max(500), 1 pro-x v-drive sac on the seat (400), 1 v-drive sac right next to it on the floor(another 400), and about 1/3 full in the front(400). All passengers (usually 3 being about 450) are on the surf side and the rub rail is for sure below the waterline. <BR> <BR>If I put more weight upfront it seems counterproductive although sometimes I get cavitation from the prop if there isn't enough. Filling the non-surf side doesn't seem to make the wake better either. <BR> <BR>There were lots of suggestions in the other thread but I'm just looking to see what other ssv riders are doing. The surf wake is definitely rideable but I wanted to get some more input to tweak it that last little bit. Usual speed is 10-11 on the pp. <BR> <BR>(Message edited by bull on July 18, 2006)

Ryan, I met Bryon Greene the web designer-owner for Wakeboard Indiana this summer. He has a 22 foot Supra and claims all he needs for a good goofy wake is to fill the starboard locker. I think he has the small ballast system. You might try posting on his web page. <BR> <BR><a href="http://www.wakeboardindiana.com/portal/desktopdefault.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.wakeboardindiana.com/portal/desktopdefault.aspx</a> <BR> <BR>Good Luck!

Thanks Ed - I'll check that site out and see if I can hook up with him. <BR> <BR>It's not like the surf wake is bad - it's just not as good as my friends centurion and I know that I have enough sacs to get there!