WakeWorld

WakeWorld (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Archive through January 11, 2007 (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=404495)
-   -   Shane Vs. Fish (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=395358)

stwake 12-09-2006 7:21 PM

ok i need your input on the 06 129 fish compared to the 06 132 Shane

mrm2083 12-09-2006 8:55 PM

A 129 fish is gona feel huge compared to a 132 shane

brody 12-09-2006 9:12 PM

If you're looking at a 132 shane, a 125 fish would be more comparable. If you're looking at a 129 fish, a 136 shane would be better for you. Do you have a 129 fish already? By your profile, you do.

stwake 12-10-2006 6:49 AM

yeah i have the 129 fish and i just bought the 132 shane

blind 12-10-2006 7:32 AM

fish, fun easy to ride,shane hope you like them fast and loose

brody 12-10-2006 9:21 AM

I've ridden the shane and is very fast, only have to cut out five-six feet to go w2w. The shane also has a ton of pop.

jwr 12-10-2006 10:29 AM

I love my 136 shane...but then again, I do like 'em fast and loose.

hyule 12-10-2006 11:20 AM

What does LOOSE really mean. Hard to hold on edge, slips out on butter slides??? Someone help. <BR> <BR>I have an 05 fish 125 and have been looking at the shanes as well.

thane_dogg 12-10-2006 10:31 PM

I rode a shane for a bit and I thought it was locked.

entrustclothing 12-11-2006 1:00 PM

i rode a fish 29 last year and then rode the shane 132 and i like the shane alot, felt like the fish just faster


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 6:59 PM.