|
Ok so I am doing a <i><b>simple</b></i> little project for a statistics course. Just need some data from you guys. <BR> <BR>I am going to plot board length vs weight, so I need your current setup's board size (in centimeters) and your weight (in pounds). <BR> <BR>Thanks everyone, also I need at least 20 data entries so keep them coming. <BR> <BR>(Message edited by sdahockey21 on April 20, 2009)
|
Length v weight or length v height? <BR> <BR>T
|
opps/ I fixed it. <BR> <BR>To clarify: <BR>board size(cm) vs your weight(lb)
|
139 and i weigh 190
|
139 cm, 145 lbs <img src="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/clipart/uhoh.gif" border=0>
|
140 cm, 195 lbs
|
143, 202
|
142 cm, 170 lbs
|
140cm and 165 lbs
|
134cm & 170lbs
|
140cm 155lbs
|
137cm 140lbs
|
141cm 185lbs
|
143 cm, 180 #s
|
144cm 225 Lbs
|
137cm, 150lbs
|
141CM 185 lbs on a good day
|
142 cm <BR>185 lbs
|
140 cm <BR>195 lbs
|
139 cm <BR>170 lbs
|
138cm <BR>130 lbs
|
134/138cm <BR>170 lbs
|
138 cm, 160 lbs
|
142 cm, 180 lbs
|
139 cm, 170 lbs
|
142 cm, 170 lbs
|
142 cm, 194 lbs
|
Steppin in to ruin your averages. <BR>147 cm, 275 lbs <BR>Of course, I've lost 50 lbs over the winter... so if you figure my weight the last time I rode, those #'s would be more like: <BR>147 cm, 238.5 lbs
|
146 cm <BR>215 lbs
|
142 cm <BR>155 lbs
|
143cm 200lbs
|
146cm <BR>175 lbs
|
oops... messed up my last post. Shoulda read: <BR> <BR>Steppin in to ruin your averages. <BR>147 cm, 275 lbs <BR>Of course, I've lost over 50 lbs over the winter... so if you figure my weight the last time I rode, those #'s would be more like: <BR>147 cm, 328.5 lbs
|
144cm 190 lbs
|
138cm 130lbs
|
210 on the 138
|
190/ 144
|
141Cm 185lbs
|
137 cm vs 180
|
139cm and 137cm 145lbs
|
140 cm, 170lbs.
|
141 cm, 175 lbs
|
142cm, 200
|
143 cm, 182.37564 lbs
|
142 cm, 206 lbs
|
165 lbs on a 142 cm
|
205 lbs on 142 cm
|
142cm 190lbs
|
143 cm 205 lbs
|
144cm 190lbs
|
144CM, 215LBS
|
142cm, 262lbs
|
134 (marius extra wide) 155lbs <BR>139 lyman (regular width)
|
144cm <BR>165lbs
|
144 205lbs
|
136 / 160
|
139/185
|
146/215
|
139/165
|
138cm <BR>154 lbs
|
140/165
|
138cm <BR>183 lbs
|
141 <BR>185lbs
|
142 cm <BR>205 lbs
|
134 cm <BR>130 lbs
|
138cm <BR>160lbs
|
138 cm <BR>160 lbs (when wet <IMG SRC="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/clipart/happy.gif" ALT=":-)" BORDER=0>
|
139cm <BR> <BR>180lbs
|
142cm/175lb
|
140cm 180lbs
|
138cm / 170 lbs.
|
142cm / 218lbs
|
142 cm/ 205lbs
|
139cm/ 160lbs.
|
143cm / 175lbs <BR> <BR>(Message edited by tvreeland on April 21, 2009)
|
142cm 175lbs
|
141 cm 180 lbs
|
142cm 165lbs
|
are you doing a correlation between height of the rider and the board length? If so i would suggest adding in the width of the board as well...yes it'll give you one more variable, but your data is not goin to be as accurate. I say that because lets say you weigh 180 and your buddy weighs 180, you ride a 09 Murray 140, and your buddy rides a LF Fish 133. They are both rated for the same weight but with the fish being a good bit wider the surface area is what should count. just my opinion. If you're doing something else with your data then my appologies. just trying to help. <BR> <BR>ps i ride the murray 140 and weigh 180
|
140cm 180lbs
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 9:46 AM. |