I've ridden behind a 220 and would say that is the best wake of all boats I've ever been behind. I've been behind everything but an X-Star. <BR>But what is Nautique's "flagship" if you only went on wake?

230.

230 or 210

the one they don't make anymore<img src="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/clipart/sad.gif" border=0>

Depends on how they are weighted... I never rode behind a 230... <BR>I have a 210, with 280 pounds in front, 80 middle, and 500 in back, plus factory ballasts... pretty hugh with lots of people in the boat... lots of fun.

230 and 210

<blockquote><hr size=0><!-quote-!><font size=1><b>quote:</b></font><p>230 and 210<!-/quote-!><hr size=0></blockquote>

im pretty satisfied with my 210's <BR><img src="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/messages/65919/717280.jpg" alt="Upload">

"But there's no way the 210's wake beats a 220's, especially when weighted comparably." <BR> <BR>They all have nice wakes, but the 210 has a better wake then the 220.

The 230 has the best wake it is shaped perfect and has massive size. Why do you think the majority of the nautique pro riders use the 230 as their boat of choice.

*cough* 2001 *cough*

IVE RIDDEN ALL 3 AND BY FAR THE 230 IS THE BEST. BUT BY THE SAME TOKEN THEY ARE ALL DECENT IF YOU KNOW HOW TO WEIGHT THEM. THE 210 IS LIKE HITTING A BRICK WALL TO ME. NO TROUGH LIKE THE 230. THE 210 IS ALSO VERY NARROW, BUT THATS DUE TO THE 2'-0" DIFFENCE OF THE 230. I WOULDNT RECCOMENT THE 220 JUST DUE TO ITS INCONSISTANCY. THE WAKE IS VERY VERY WASHY AND ROLLS ON YOU VERY EASY. OBVIOULY IM PRO 230. JUST DEPENDS ON YOUR POCKETS. IF YOU HAVE THE 80K TO DROP GET A 230. IF NOT GET A 210 AND JUST WEIGHT IT CORRECTLY. I WOULD RECOMEND GETTING A HOLD OF MURRAY ON HERE AND SEE WHAT HIS RECCOMENDATIONS ARE. HES GOT THE WEIGHTING THING DOWN TO A SCIENCE. BUT I WOULDNT WASTE MY BENJI'S ON A 220 TO SAVE MY LIFE.

2001 210 Team was my favorite boat of all time. The 220 has an amazing wake but is very temperamental left to right. The 230 is the new flagship I would say. I have not ridden in or behind one of these.

AND IF YOU REALLY HAVE THE MONEY....GO GET A X-STAR

the 220 is the worst wake i have ever ridden. The 220 is sooooo inconsistant. My best friend has one and i wont ride behind it anymore. 210 one of the best.

LEE DANIELS...TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK

IM NOT YELLIN' THIS IS HOW I TALK!!!!

HOW DARE YOU! I HAVE VOICE IMMODULATION SYNDROME! A LITTLE BIT SOFTER NOW! A LITTLE BIT SOFTER NOW!

lee, you're typing, not talking...

I'll trade my 07'X-Star for a SAN 230 any day!!

Any pics of the 230 wake?

Eubanks, we will be getting our 2010 230 here pretty soon, how about you come out for some pulls, when she gets here? That's Better then a pic.

IMAGINE HOW MUCH FUN IT WOULD BE IF WE <b>ALL</b> TALKED IN CAPS, ALL THE TIME. <BR> <BR>WOULD LEE THEN TYPE IN LOWERCASE TO MAKE HIS POSTS STAND OUT MORE? HMM, LEE?? WOULD YOU???

Jeff - Thanks Bro! That would be awesome! I need to make a day trip out there this fall to ride with you and check out the cable.

I will let you know when she gets here. <BR>We started filling the lake, things are moving along much faster, the cable system will be on the site Aug 13, looks like Sept is the month to look forward too.

The only thing now Jeff is to heat the cable lake so I can come back from school and ride everyday over winter break<img src="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/clipart/proud.gif" border=0>

How about I sell you a drysuit and you can ride all year around hahahahahahaha, see you when you come back for Winter Break.<img src="http://www.wakeworld.com/MB/Discus/clipart/proud.gif" border=0>

sweet jeff, stoked about september now! <BR> <BR>but on topic ive only heard good things about 210s and 230s and nothing but bad about 220s. havent tried any out yet though!

I have to say that the wake behind a fully loaded 230 has got to be the best wake I have ever ridden. It is just massive and has a nice transition unlike the older versions. <BR> <BR>The 210 is nice too, when loaded properly, but doesn't compare to the 230.

I'm happy with my 220. I don't think it's hard to get a consistent wake out of it. You just need to know what you are doing with the weight and you will be fine.

+1 for the 220. that wake has a steeper transition that the 210 or 230. just get the weight dialed in and quit whining. its got more straight up pop than most other boats i've ridden. its sick.

Its all based on personal preference and riding style IMO. My vote is for the 210.

230 when its slammed or the 210 stock IMO

01 Super Air Non Team Because you can load a larger sack in the floor ski locker! <BR> <BR>(Message edited by r8dohead on July 17, 2009)

spill the secret reciepe then. Its funny cause now that i have a VLX my buddy hasnt taken his 220 out one time and talks about the reason he doesnt is because it just doesnt compare. <BR> <BR>He's know trying to dump it.

230 is the bomb! Best wake out there. SAN all the wayyyyyyyy! Anybody rode behind those new Axis boats? I heard the A22 is sweet too.

How wide is the 230 wake @ 24 mi/hr with stock ballast? <BR>Meaning is the 230 wake, on average, more wide or normal than most boats?

I rode behind a stock 08 230 a few times and the wake was pretty big for no extra weight but the wake felt soft. Almost like I was punching through it. Any idea's? Just add more weight? <BR> <BR>In regards to the previous question, I thnk the wake is slightly wider than the average boat. <BR> <BR>(Message edited by mac attack on July 18, 2009)

I need to get behind a 230...

Shawn Watsons 230 is the biggest wake ive ever ridden behind.

Rode behind an 06 211 team for the first time and can say it slung a nice one.

sweet name drop mahoney ;) <BR> <BR>210 = great <BR>230 = more great

The only time I have been behind a 230 is in big chop so it was hard to get a real feel for it but the 210 is wayyyy better than the 220. The 220 can get nice it is just that you have to load the front of the boat so much to keep it balanced that it submarines in any kind of rollers. The 210 like weight in the back and it sometimes will porpoise with the hydrogate down and weighted heavy in the rear.