Better wake pics of New 210 Log Out | Topics | Search | Register | Edit Profile | User List
Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Moderators | Help/Instructions
WakeWorld Discussion Board » >> Boats, Accessories & Tow Vehicles Archive » Archive through February 09, 2007 » Better wake pics of New 210 « Previous Next »
By Colin Fichman (tidalwake0504) on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 8:13 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
New pics from planetnautique.com..not sure how it was weighted....im guessing at 1500 extra.
 
By Colin Fichman (tidalwake0504) on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 8:13 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Upload
Upload
Upload
Upload

 
By Colin Fichman (tidalwake0504) on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 8:14 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Notice the size of the rooster tail. Seems to change perspective a little.
 
By Colin Chisolm (closedtoe) on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 8:16 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
That wake looks nice. How tall are you??
 
By ryan jensen (trx1noob) on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 8:42 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
holy snikee your up there. can the rooster tail be tames, perty huge??
 
By AJ M (ajmac) on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 8:47 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Just curious, what's the big deal about the rooster tail? Thanks
 
By Tom (laptom) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 4:00 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Nice wake... Better then expected. But how about some figures (speed, ballast, etc)?
 
By Tom (laptom) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 4:02 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Nice wake... Better then expected. But how about some figures (speed, ballast, etc)?
 
By Mike O'Callaghan (greenpinky) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 4:38 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Looks great! Now that's more like a Nautique - especially with that trademark rooster. I'm guessing it's slammed though.
 
By Kevin R Baugh (krbaugh) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 6:59 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Wow that boat must have a ton of weight in it
The rooster tail looks as tall or taller than the boarder.
Are you sure thats not a jet boat

The wake does look nice!

(Message edited by krbaugh on January 31, 2007)

 
By John Horton (bigpimpin4u) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 7:18 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
That looks like Murray.
 
By Lucky275 (lcky275) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 7:41 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
It loo' good to meeeee
 
By Cliff Griffin (seattle) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 7:46 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
It looks kinda like the 211's wake. The D'up picks don't really give us any perspective on the boat though.
 
By MAC (mac_attack) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:08 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
That wake looks awesome. What other boat would you consider it most like?

Any pics of the boat?

 
By MAC (mac_attack) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:10 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Nevermind. I see the reference now.
 
By travis moye (driving) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:34 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Pretty sure its Adam Wensink.
 
By leo lasecki (malibuboarder75) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 9:10 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Adam is like 5'2. I only met him once, but I know he was short, hope I dont piss him off if he is taller.
 
By C.I.E. J-Rod (jarrod) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 9:12 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
WOW. That wake is impressive. Looks like the perfect balance of ramp and lip to me.
 
By  matt c (curtisco24) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 9:35 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Thats a very nice wake.
 
By Billy (woreout) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 9:39 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Wake looks great, too bad the boat looks like a Ebtide or SeaDoo boat. The rooster tail almost makes it back to the rider.
 
By TackleBerry (socalwakepunk) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 9:52 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
With mine, I know when the rooster is big, the wake is macking...a good sign.
 
By leo lasecki (malibuboarder75) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 10:34 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
That has to be a lot of weight, because we rode the boat with stock plust 10 people, and it was nowhere near.
 
By GD (greatdane) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 10:41 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Can't almost any boat kick up a big wake if you sack the crap out of it?
So, isn't it important to know how this boat is sacked?
The old 210 was amazing because you got a great wake without killing the boats drive/economy performance.

 
By C.I.E. J-Rod (jarrod) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 10:48 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Are people really concerned with the "roster tail?" The only person hating that should be the photog.
 
By Nate (norcalmalibu) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 11:27 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
I don't think people are hating on the "roster tail." I think people know that when you have a tail like that, usually you have a ton of weight in it.

I agree with GD, personally I don't want a boat that I have to put a ton of weight in it. Im not in the market for carrying around 2k or more worth of weight. Its hard on everything and makes driving a boat feel like your driving a tank.

 
By TackleBerry (socalwakepunk) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 12:03 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
"The old 210 was amazing because you got a great wake without killing the boats drive/economy performance."

Don't care what kind of boat it is, if it makes the wake better, I will be piling in the weight. Have yet to ride any wake that I thought was too big. Have yet to find a boat that has a wake that does not benefit from extra weight.

 
By Rod Rinnert (deltahoosier) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 1:31 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Looks like someone is putting too much weight in the back if you are throwing that kind of rooster tail. That will kill handling and speed control.
 
By Benedict Stichel (benniger) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 1:52 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Wake looks very good...
 
By Darren Yearsley (ralph) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 2:52 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
"Don't care what kind of boat it is, if it makes the wake better, I will be piling in the weight. Have yet to ride any wake that I thought was too big. Have yet to find a boat that has a wake that does not benefit from extra weight"

I don't think anybody disagrees with that but the point is some boats will produce a big and fun wake @ half the ballast of other boats. That translates to less hassle and less running costs.

 
By TackleBerry (socalwakepunk) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 3:01 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
True, but it's been my experience that the it's the bigger boats that need the most weight. I run 2k in my CC. Do you think there is 2k in this one? 2k is not enough for some other boats out there (will spare the bashing, no need to name).
 
By TackleBerry (socalwakepunk) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 5:18 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Sorry, I may have been a bit unclear with my opinion.

GD is right, it would be nice to know how much weight is in it, for referrence. I have no idea how much. As long as it isn't ridiculous (3-4k, IMO), I'm good with it.

I guess my point is that I have a boat that others would put very little weight in, I put quite a bit in it. I would think that would work in proportional sense with regards to other boats. Maybe others share some of my views, any boat is going to need weight, not a big deal, it's worth it.

And if I can add another IMO, when weighted properly, the handling should not suffer much. sure it will require a little more effort, but not a deal breaker. When the rooster is up, the wake is kicking.

 
By Tim Krutz (timmy) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 5:23 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
looks like fun to me!
 
By Big Ed (big_ed_x2) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 5:34 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
The wake does look good.
I agree with you Jeff,EVERY BOAT NEEDS WEIGHT.Bigger boats have bigger storage compartments so just plumb your fat sacs and it doesn't matter if it's 4g,as long as you don't have to tow it around.Reprop,get bigger engine in the boat and sac the hell out of it.Wakeboarding is an expensive sport already so might as well make the wake kickin!

 
By Robb Davis (boarder_x) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 5:41 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Just went to planetnautique.com.

The rider is: 5'6".
Speed: 24.5.
Line: 85'.

No info on weight.

 
By Darren Yearsley (ralph) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 5:59 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
I think your point is pretty clear Jeff. Everybody uses there boats differently, I have never had to hand fill a sac in my boat and the wake is good enough with my "Factory" system and 550 pounds of lead. I rode a bigger and better wake out of an 06 VLX but we had to hand fill 3 big sacs and it used gas at twice what my boat does, it was fun but not something I would run personally.
 
By max luna (lfshane132) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 6:22 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
greg meloon showed me the wakesurf pics of this boat and its amazing it curls like an ocean wave and have alot of room to work with
 
By matt Winans (liquidmx) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 7:27 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
I wonder if there is anywhere to sit with all that weight, lol.

I am not impressed until I know the weight added.

 
By TackleBerry (socalwakepunk) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 7:52 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Big Ed - "when weighted properly, the handling should not suffer much" I was thinking of your boat, lot of weight, big wake, handled really nice.
 
By leo lasecki (malibuboarder75) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:04 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Anyone want to start guessing?

I say 3000lb on top of stock.

 
By ryan andrews (drewsnautique94) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:11 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
haters...............noHATERS. just because you can't afford a new nautique(SHOWN WITH CLASS),don't be a hater...keep riding you moobius centrions mb's etc...........imo there;s two boats mastercraft& correctcrafts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..............dont be a hater............i have seen it, yes weighted its fu#$in sick..............give props when props is due!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
By Kevin R Baugh (krbaugh) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:35 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
Now who is the "hater"

"...........imo there;s two boats mastercraft& correctcrafts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..............dont be a hater."
:-()

 
By Mike O'Callaghan (greenpinky) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 5:04 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Can we please stop using that word?
 
By kevin mcginty (kmcginty) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 7:34 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
which word?

noHATERS?
there;s?
moobius?
or ...............!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?

 
By Billy (woreout) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 7:38 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
I think he meant the word CorrectCrafts.
 
By C.I.E. J-Rod (jarrod) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 7:40 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
"SHOWN WITH CLASS"

Unlike you??

 
By Anodyne (anodyne) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 8:07 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Wow... Andrews, I think you would be better off avoiding conversation when possible.
 
By Boca is Closed (cptoafficiency) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 8:42 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
I'm not a smart man, Jen-neah.
 
By matt Winans (liquidmx) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 8:46 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Haha, Dogma and ignorance must go hand in hand!
 
By TK (swab791) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 9:39 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Thwe ROSTER TAIL should be of concern if a rider is at 60 FT. That tail looks like it almost hits the rider at 85. Over Ballasted to achieve that wake size?
 
By Scott (K.B.C.) (sperbet) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 9:47 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
WOW, what a stupid comment. Makes me ashamed to be a CC owner and get lumped into the same category as that.
 
By Big Ed (big_ed_x2) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 10:39 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
WHATEVER,People just don't understand that wake and boats are all preference and get mad when somebody expresses how much they like a certain boat!

Get over it people,that's why there is many boat companies not just 2!

 
By C.I.E.....Evan (guido) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 11:23 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Ha, ha, ha.... Now that's funny. I really just want to know how it was weighted. That wake looks kickin'.

I'll reserve judgement on that boat for a while. It always takes a while for people to get weighting dialed on a new boat.

 
By billy e (projectely4) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 11:34 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
the last time i saw pics from planetnautique of a wake they forgot to mention the boat had 5000 lbs of weight in it. probably the same with this 210. why not post some pics of the wake with reasonable amounts of weight that allow the boat to plane before getting to the otherside of the lake.
 
By Mike O'Callaghan (greenpinky) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 6:11 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
What exactly do you mean, Ed? I'm not sure where you're going with that.
 
By Big Ed (big_ed_x2) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 8:05 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
By ryan andrews (drewsnautique94) on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:11 pm:


quote:

haters...............noHATERS. just because you can't afford a new nautique(SHOWN WITH CLASS),don't be a hater...keep riding you moobius centrions mb's etc...........imo there;s two boats mastercraft& correctcrafts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..............dont be a hater............i have seen it, yes weighted its fu#$in sick..............give props when props is due!!!!!!!!!!!!!





By Scott (K.B.C.) (sperbet) on Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 9:47 am:


quote:

WOW, what a stupid comment. Makes me ashamed to be a CC owner and get lumped into the same category as that.




and then read my post!

 
By Scott (K.B.C.) (sperbet) on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 8:49 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
I'm all for people expressing their opinion about a boat they love. I love my old 210 and I'll be the first to say it, HOWEVER when I state that opinion I'm not going to do it by talking everyone else that had posted before me. Call them poor, talk crap on their boat, etc, etc.
 
By BCH (brhanley) on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 9:22 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Can't we all (big ed x2 and sperbet) get along? Mastercraft and Correct Craft uniting to make the (wake) world a better place?
 
By Scott (K.B.C.) (sperbet) on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 9:29 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
That's it, Brian you're out. Me and the pirate are forming our own crew. See ya on the lake sucka!
 
By Boca is Closed (cptoafficiency) on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 9:30 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Not if I have anything to say about that, matey.
 
By Scott (K.B.C.) (sperbet) on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 9:36 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
Troll!
 
By Big Ed (big_ed_x2) on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 12:02 pm:    Edit Post Delete Post
BCH,I was agreeing with Scott!

I was disgusted by his comments....There are A LOT of great boats!

 
By billy foulds (mcwakerider) on Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 8:34 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
dang... that guy sure made a lot of friends on here. Boat manufacturers have come a long ways. All the boats now are good. And besides, you can weight the crap out of a boat and you'll get a good wake out of just about any boat. Moombas, Centurions, and MB's included. I will say tho, that X-2 in the delta pics. That wake looked insane
 
By Curt Bernstein (curtbernstein) on Monday, February 05, 2007 - 6:37 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
that wake looks great.. and id like to say nice hoochie, but it looks likke your coming from the right.. wat trick are u doing in that last pic?
 
By Sinko (sinkoumn) on Monday, February 05, 2007 - 8:17 am:    Edit Post Delete Post
^^^^^^^^
I believe that's an OHH (other hand hooch).

 
Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions Administration
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
WakeSpace is owned by eWake, Inc.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, All Rights Reserved.
WakeSpace@WakeWorld.com